_________________WTN-L World Tibet Network News _________________
Published by: The Canada Tibet Committee
Editorial Board: Brian Given, Conrad Richter, Nima Dorjee,
Tseten Samdup, Thubten (Sam) Samdup
WTN Editors: wtn-editors@tibet.ca
_________________________________________________________________
ISSUE ID: 00/01/22 Compiled by Tseten Samdup
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Saturday, January 22, 2000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Contents:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Don't Shut Out the Dalai Lama (FEER)
2. Seoul to oppose Dalai Lama visit to South Korea (AFP)
3. The Goal of Freedom (FPT)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Don't Shut Out the Dalai Lama (FEER)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Lodi Gyaltsen Gyari
Far Eastern Economic Review
The writer, based in Washington, is the Dalai Lama's special envoy.
The 1998 summit meeting between Chinese leader Jiang Zemin and United
States President Bill Clinton had evoked hopes that progress on the Tibet
issue would soon be at hand. However, this hope was short-lived, as the
summit didn't lead to any talk between China's leaders and His Holiness the
Dalai Lama.
Indications from Beijing are that there is an intense debate within the
leadership on its approach to the Tibet issue. Pragmatists are still not in
the majority and new information reveals that Beijing may have a more
hardline position on Tibet than its public position may depict. In late
1999, a Tibetan-language newspaper in India, the Tibet Times, published a
confidential document in which a senior Chinese official was quoted saying
the following: "We have no need to engage in dialogue with the Dalai Lama.
The Dalai Lama's return to China will bring a great risk of instability. We
will then not be able to control Tibet. The Dalai Lama is now fairly old.
At the most, it will be 10 years before he dies. When he dies, the issue of
Tibet is resolved for ever. We, therefore, have to use skillful means to
prevent his return."
If that is indeed Beijing's conclusion, its approach to the Tibet issue
couldn't be more simplistic or misguided. While China is an important
global power with the potential to become a leader among nations, it is
also its own worst enemy. Ignoring the value of working with the Dalai Lama
must rank at the top of its self-destructive tendencies.
Still, the quote from the senior Chinese official does answer one question
that has puzzled governments and China-watchers. Why has China continued to
erect roadblocks to negotiations? This despite the Dalai Lama's firm
commitment to negotiate a solution within the framework of the People's
Republic of China. The answer would appear to be that it's hoping to not
have to deal with the Dalai Lama. Yet it is foolhardy for Beijing to think
that it can wait for the Dalai Lama to be out of the picture. He is only in
his mid-60s, far younger than many of today's world leaders. And, unlike
other leaders who hold their positions for a limited time, the Dalai Lama
faces no term limit. Furthermore, his moral authority transcends his
political position, and the Tibetan people's devotion to him remains strong
and will grow even stronger over time.
Of course, without the Dalai Lama the Tibet movement would be devastated.
But the longer the Chinese government waits in trying to resolve the Tibet
issue, the greater it will be that resentment and defiance will grow and
the more difficult it will be to convince Tibetans to accept a solution
short of independence. The danger exists of a more extreme leadership then
emerging. Most importantly, the death of the present Dalai Lama in exile
would immortalize the Tibetan resistance against Chinese rule in such a way
that would be extremely hard for a future Tibetan or Chinese leader to
overturn.
If China's leaders desire peace in Tibet and stability throughout the
People's Republic, they need the Dalai Lama's help. Once they respond
positively to his overtures, the Dalai Lama could use his moral authority
to ensure the successful implementation of a negotiated settlement.
A peaceful resolution in Tibet could then help assure more restive regions,
such as Eastern Turkestan, also known as Xinjiang, that dialogue is more
effective in solving problems than taking up arms, and that China is
capable of respecting diversity. Similarly, with Central Asia reasserting
its historical role, a stable Tibet would contribute greatly to peace in
this sensitive region. Further, friendly relations between India and China
are possible only in the absence of the current instability on the Tibetan
plateau.
Some say the reason China isn't moving on the Tibet issue is because it has
placed Taiwan much higher on its agenda. This may be true, but it's
short-sighted to believe that these two issues exist in isolation from each
other. On the contrary, an acceptable resolution in Tibet could help win
the confidence of the leaders and people of Taiwan, as well as individuals
and governments around the world.
His Holiness the Dalai Lama is the solution to the situation in Tibet. If
the political will exists, there will be no major hurdles to negotiations,
at least on the fundamental issues. The paramount concern of China is the
unity of the PRC, and the Dalai Lama is committed to not seeking
independence. Similarly, China's leaders should revisit assurances about
Tibet's status made by Mao Zedong, Zhou Enlai, Hu Yaobang, Deng Xiaoping
and others. The Dalai Lama also is one of the strongest advocates for
change and has no wish to return Tibet to the system that existed before
1959. But it must be said that China's leftist policies, in place in Tibet
for decades, are the root of problems there and must be reversed.
The Chinese leadership should work with the Dalai Lama, whose commitment to
nonviolence and negotiation remains steadfast. To do so would have positive
reverberations throughout Asia, and indeed would provide China with the
legitimacy it needs to be fully accepted by the international community.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Seoul to oppose Dalai Lama visit to South Korea (AFP)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEOUL, Jan 21 (AFP) - South Korea's government will oppose a planned visit
to Seoul by Tibetan spiritual leader the Dalai Lama, a government official
said Friday.
The stance, which reflects fears the trip could damage Seoul's fledgling
ties with China, emerged in the wake of reports that the Dalai Lama intends
to apply for a visa to attend lectures and humanitarian gatherings here.
"The government is negative toward his visit here as it has been in the
past," the foreign ministry official in charge of Tibetan affairs told AFP
"It would cause a serious problem to us," he said. The Dalai Lama's
reported desire to visit South Korea -- where Buddhism claims the largest
religious following -- presents President Kim Dae-Jung with a serious
dilemma.
Kim has been building up his image as a champion of human rights. But his
government has also been treading carefully to strengthen diplomatic ties
with China.
South Korea only established diplomatic relations with China in 1992,
having previously recognised Taiwan. Ties between the two countries have
taken a major step forward here this week with the first ever visit by a
Chinese defence minister.
Yonhap News Agency reported Friday that the student council of Seoul
National University and the school's association of Buddhists last month
sent an invitation to Dalai Lama, who in turn accepted it.
Karma Gelek, head of the Office of Tibet in Tokyo, said in an interview
with Yonhap Friday that the Dalai Lama will apply for an entry visa in a
couple of weeks for his first visit to Seoul in April.
If the visit went ahead he would give lectures and attend academic and
humanitarian functions.
Buddhists here on Friday urged the government to allow the visit. The
foreign ministry official noted that some Buddhist groups had attempted to
invite the Dalai Lama in the past but had given up in the face of
opposition from the government.
"We will try hard to persuade the students to rescind the invitation," the
official said.
"His visit would not be beneficial to the country's national interest." The
present Dalai Lama has lived in exile in northern India since he fled Tibet
in 1959 after China brutally suppressed an uprising against Chinese rule.
Since then the Dalai Lama has been an outspoken critic of China's human
rights record in Tibet and has sought automomy for the region.
In response, Beijing has sought to isolate him and often reacts angrily
when other countries welcome him.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. The Goal of Freedom (FPT)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fort Pierce Tribune
Date: 17 january 2000
Priyanka Sheth
Student activists learn nonviolent ways to protest the treatment of
Tibetans by China
TREASURE COAST At age 17, the decision to leave his small village in the
Himalayan Mountains and move to a refugee camp in India was very painful
for Lobsang Wangdu.
The Tibetan endured relentless cold and hid with two other friends in a
truck headed for Nepal. If the Chinese had captured the escapees, it would
have meant imprisonment without a trial, torture at the hands of the
police, and may be even execution. After spending two days evading Chinese
and Nepalese officials, the teens sneaked into India.
"My parents didn't want me to go away," Wangdu said, shaking his head.
"They were afraid for me."
The wiry Tibetan, now 30, hasn't seen his parents or his siblings in 13
years. The family still lives in Phenpo Village, which is two hours drive
from Lhasa, Tibet's capital.
"Inside of the Tibet, the situation is very bad," he said. "All the jobs
and opportunities are taken by the Chinese.
"Young Tibetans are not getting education, and everybody is become
depression-prone," Wangdu said. There is alcoholism, and Tibetan culture is
dying inside Tibet . . . we are all worried."
So is the Dalai Lama, the spiritual leader of the Tibetans. Earlier this
year in an Associated Press interview, the former Nobel Prize winner
accused China of committing cultural genocide against people of Tibet.
Wangdu is among 130,000 Tibetans living in exile in India, the United
States, and Europe.
Since his escape, the Buddhist philosophy scholar has tried to help his
parents leave Tibet, but the Chinese government has refused to give them
passports.
About six years ago, Wangdu moved to the United States on a visiting
scholar's program, and applied for political asylum. He vows to pursue the
exile community's overriding cause: freeing Tibet from China's oppressive
occupation by seeking U.S. political and financial support. Wangdu
currently is the membership coordinator of the Milarepa Fund, based in San
Francisco. The nonprofit agency actively supports the nonviolent social
change. He is among 175 students from across the country and the world who
attended a six-day training camp at Kashi Ashram in Roseland.
Hosted by the Students for a Free Tibet, the camp taught students mostly in
their 20s and 30s on how to use civil disobedience tactics to free Tibet.
"The action camp offered training in the strategic use of nonviolent direct
action and campaign tactics to fight for justice in Tibet," said John
Hocevar, SFT president.
The Council for World Tibet Day provided the site for the training camp.
The Council is associated with the Kashi Foundation. Ma Jaya Bhagavati,
director of the organization, founded World Tibet Day. Her student, Brahma
Das, founded the Interfaith Call for Freedom of Worship in Tibet last year.
World Tibet Day was observed simultaneously in 51 cities in 10 countries.
During the six-week camp, Berkeley-based Ruckus Society taught students how
to scale buildings, hang huge banners, and form human chains. It also
staged role-playing skits and interactive exercises to teach students
maneuvers on how to outsmart and elude authorities. John Sellers, Ruckus'
33-year-old director, took part in the World Trade Organization protests in
Seattle. His group engaged in nonviolent demonstrations, highlighting
human-rights abuses in countries like China and child labor in Third World
countries.
"We were against undemocratic, unaccountable, untransparent corporate
power, which is embodied in the WTO," Sellers said. "They have a secret
corporate agenda that wouldn't stand the scrutiny of any kind of public,
and they keep it behind close doors and that is immoral and unacceptable."
At the WTO protests, Tibet activists also were successful in raising
concerns about China's entry into the organization. "I was happy to
collaborate with Students for Free Tibet," Sellers said, who organized
three intensive workshops.
At Kashi Ashram, the trainers also organized seminars on the WTO
demonstrations, and the World Bank protests in New York. In the evenings,
students also took part in Tibetan cultural events, including music and
dance performances. They listened to leaders from the Tibetan exile groups,
including Nawang Rabgyal, an emissary representing the Dalai Lama.
Subhadra Mitchell, 14, ninth-grade student at The River School in Vero
Beach, was among nine students who took part in the training camp. Mitchell
was the second youngest student at the camp. "I have been doing a lot of
climbing ropes," said Mitchell, who lives in the ashram with her parents,
Durgamayee and Baba Ram. "I have met so many people and I have learned
about issues in Burma, Tibet and taking part in the political theatre."
Brahma Das, who is Mitchell's faculty advisor, said he was very impressed.
"She was glowing," he said. "I saw her mother today, and her mother's says,
"it's fabulous, and she is going to be the backbone of the local chapter."
While the problems of Tibet may appear miles away, they are not for more
than 5,000 Tibetans who live in the U.S. Though their numbers are small,
they are not squeamish about voicing their discontent. "The international
(community) doesn't want to support Tibet because the Chinese are very
strong," said Lhakpa Tsering, 37, executive director of Tibetan Alliance of
Chicago, a support group that promotes Tibetan issues. "The international
community is not having any benefits from freeing Tibetans . . . that's why
may be they don't want to help us."
Tsering, who also attended the camp, also called the Clinton
Administration's China policy "wishy-washy."
"The government has its own agenda because there is a huge business
interest in China, with its billion people," he said. "Even the United
Nations, which is more of a 'united government' has its own agenda."
___________________________________________________________________________
Send articles to: wtn-editors@tibet.ca
Subscriptions to: listserv@lists.mcgill.ca (SUB WTN-L [your name])
Cancellations to: listserv@lists.mcgill.ca (SIGNOFF WTN-L)
WTN Archived at: http://www.tibet.ca
___________________________________________________________________________