Radicali.it - sito ufficiale di Radicali Italiani
Notizie Radicali, il giornale telematico di Radicali Italiani
cerca [dal 1999]


i testi dal 1955 al 1998

  RSS
dom 18 mag. 2025
[ cerca in archivio ] ARCHIVIO STORICO RADICALE
Conferenza Tibet
Partito Radicale Massimo - 11 febbraio 2000
WTN-L 10/02/2000

_________________ WTN-L World Tibet Network News _________________

Published by: The Canada Tibet Committee

Editorial Board: Brian Given, Conrad Richter, Nima Dorjee,

Tseten Samdup, Thubten (Sam) Samdup

WTN Editors: wtn-editors@tibet.ca

______________________________________________________________________

Issue ID: 00/02/10 Compiled by Thubten (Sam) Samdup

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thursday, February 10, 2000

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Contents:

----------------------------------------------------------------------

1. JOINT PRESS RELEASE - EU MUST SPONSOR RESOLUTION

2. Wrap Up the Shahtoosh Trade -- IFAW Calls on Fashion Industry

to Prevent Extinction of Tibetan Antelope

3. People have the power

4. Studio chiefs battle China syndrome

----------------------------------------------------------------------

1. JOINT PRESS RELEASE - EU MUST SPONSOR RESOLUTION

----------------------------------------------------------------------

February 10, 2000

As the 56th session of the U.N. Commission on Human Rights approaches,

we, the undersigned organizations, urge the European Union to fully

acknowledge China's deteriorating human rights situation by

co-sponsoring a resolution on China.

Since 1997, the European Union has abandoned support for a China

resolution at the Commission in favor of relegating criticism of Beijing

to behind-the-scenes discussion, in the framework of a constructive

dialogue on human rights. But the approach of dialogue alone has proved

futile in stopping rights violations, let alone in fostering fundamental

human rights progress.

The Chinese government is currently conducting the most ruthless

repression of dissent since the 1989 crackdown. This is most vividly

evidenced in the drive against the Falungong movement and the harsh

sentencing of labor, political and spiritual activists and Tibetan

religious leaders to prison terms of up to 18 years. Thus we are

seriously questioning the substitution of quiet diplomacy for

multilateral pressure as a way to effectively improve the human rights

situation in the People's Republic of China.

In the history of the Commission, a China resolution has not yet been

adopted. Thus its full potential has never been realized. Yet, even in

its unfulfilled state, the resolution has provided a key focus for

debate about the state of human rights in the PRC and has exerted an

important form of pressure on Chinese authorities. The experience of

the last several years demonstrates the Chinese government's

extraordinary sensitivity to the prospect of debate on its human rights

record in the U.N.'s highest human rights situation. The past shows

that the kind of pressure resulting from the tabling of a resolution on

China has generally been a successful tactic for achieving concessions

from Beijing, such as the occasional release of prisoners, promises to

sign U.N. treaties or steps towards legal reform. By the same token,

when the prospect of a resolution was abandoned, these kinds of

concessions dwindled.

Dialogue must not become an end in itself, and that is now happening

with China. Continuation of the dialogue, with the prospect of

predictable marginal concessions which have no bearing on the current

crackdown, cannot be enough any longer. We strongly believe that

multilateral pressure must now be part of the strategy to enforce

respect for human rights in China. Dialogue without pressure in the

face of persistent gross violations of human rights is simply

appeasement and degrades the authority of international human rights

standards.

The United States has already announced that it would support a

resolution on China this year. In the interest of upholding the

universality of human rights, it is of the utmost importance that the

issue of human rights in China be taken up as a multilateral effort, and

not be reduced to a topic of U.S.-China politics in accordance with its

own aims in relation to Common Foreign and Security Policy, namely to

develop and strengthen democracy and rule of law as well as human rights

and fundamental freedoms (art. II EU Treaty), the European Union has a

significant role to play.

Although the main impetus for change will come from within China, we

believe the international, multilateral pressure provides crucial

leverage to those forces inside China that favor progress towards more

respect for human rights. The European Union has asserted that the

possibility of tabling a resolution would be re-examined every year,

depending on the progress of the human rights situation in China. We

firmly believe that there is sufficient indication that China has taken

a radical step backwards in the realm of human rights. Thus we urge the

European Union to support a China resolution at the 56th session of the

U.N. Commission on Human Rights.

SUPPORTING ORGANIZATIONS CONTACTS

Amnesty International (AI). Gaby Juen, ++ 322 548 27 77

Human Rights in China (HRIC) New York. XQ Pans, Marie Holzman. ++331 45

85 2376

Human Rights Watch (HRW) Lotte Leicht. ++322 732 20 09

International Federation of Human Rights (FIDH) Beatrice Laroche ++331

46 51 38 48

International Campaign for Tibet (ICT) Tsering Jampa ++ 31 20 330 82 65

Reporters Sans Frontieres (RSF) Vincent Brossel ++331 44 83 84 84

----------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Wrap Up the Shahtoosh Trade -- IFAW Calls on Fashion Industry

to Prevent Extinction of Tibetan Antelope

----------------------------------------------------------------------

LONDON, Feb. 10 /PRNewswire/ -- As fashion weeks in London, Paris and

Milan reveal designs and trends for Autumn and Winter 2000, the

International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW--www.ifaw.org) is

highlighting how fashionable demand for the high-priced shahtoosh shawl

is bringing an entire species to the brink of extinction.

IFAW is urging top designers to help stamp out the illegal trade in

Tibetan antelope skins which are used to make the luxury fine woolen

shawls known as shahtoosh [1]. If the shahtoosh trade, fuelled by demand

from the West, continues at this pace it is estimated that the Tibetan

antelope will be extinct within five years. IFAW is asking designers in

Europe, the USA and Delhi to sign a pledge

(http://www.ifaw.org/pdfs/pledgeform.pdf) to help raise awareness of the

illegal shahtoosh trade which follows a trail from China to India where

they are woven and then illegally sold to markets in Europe or America.

But although shahtoosh shawls continue to be sold discretely in

countries such as the UK, USA, Italy and France, the trade has been

illegal for over twenty years and shahtoosh itself is illegal contraband

[2].

The Tibetan antelope, also known as the chiru, inhabits only the remote

plateau of Tibet and Xinjiang and Qinghai provinces of China. The chiru

population has dropped from several million at the turn of the 20th

Century to less than 75,000 today. Only last month, dozens of poachers

were arrested in the Qinghai Province and since the beginning of January

this year 700 pelts and 1,000 rounds of ammunition were confiscated by

the Chinese Authorities. Due to lack of patrols and new routes taken by

the poachers, the illegal killing of the chiru continues unabated.

Myths have been created by illegal traders that Tibetan nomads gather

the fine strands of wool left by the chiru from bushes that don't even

exist on the barren plateaus which is the habitat of the chiru. The

reality is grim. This rare and beautiful animal is becoming a true

fashion victim. The herds of chiru are easy prey on the open plains for

poachers who gun them down in the thousands, skin them and leave the

corpses to rot. Poachers even target the chiru breeding grounds, gunning

down pregnant chiru and mothers with their young [3].

Grace Gabriel, Director of IFAW's China office said; ``The poachers

regard chiru skin more precious than gold. They are following pregnant

females into the calving grounds and killing them indiscriminately. It

is heart breaking to see the baby chiru, still suckling even when the

mother had been killed and skinned. Killing these animals just so their

wool can adorn the necks of the rich is appalling and must stop. The

Chinese Authorities are looking to the fashion industry to help stop the

illegal trade.''

Mike Baker of the IFAW UK office commented; ``It's pure ignorance on the

part of the consumer within the fashion elite that enables this illegal

trade to continue. We are sure that wearers of shahtoosh would not want

to be responsible for the demise of the Tibetan antelope. The fashion

industry must immediately use their powerful market influence to raise

awareness of this continuing illegal trade and stamp out demand for

shahtoosh before it's too late. We are not talking about a luxury shawl

- it's a shroud''.

As well as promoting awareness throughout the fashion world, IFAW is

supporting the Chinese Government's resolution to the Convention on

Trade in Endangered Species, which calls for support in ending the

illegal trade in Tibetan antelope skins. IFAW is also working with

groups in India to target the illegal market there, and is funding

anti-poaching patrols and education programs on the ground in China.

SOURCE: International Fund for Animal Welfare

----------------------------------------------------------------------

3. People have the power

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Patti Smith, David Byrne, Angelique Kidjo, Philip Glass and others throw

a New Year's benefit party for Tibet.

By Seth Mnookin

Feb. 9, 2000 (Salon) -- "I'd like to thank all of you Phish fans," Patti

Smith said before the finale of Saturday's annual Tibet House benefit on

the eve of the Tibetan New Year, and on cue, the upper balconies of

storied Carnegie Hall -- the cheap seats on a night when prime orchestra

spots went for upward of $100 -- erupted in cheers. Nodding to the

twirling, dreadlocked masses, Smith couldn't help giggling. "See, now

that's a collective voice. Good for you."

While Phish's Trey Anastasio, appearing at the Tibet House benefit for

the second time, may have elicited the most fervent fan reaction, he was

hardly the musical highlight of a night that moved smoothly from the

quietly transcendent -- and there is no other word for the otherworldly

chanting of the monks from Drepung Gomang Buddhist Monastic University

-- to the deeply sensual sounds of Brazilian singer Virginia Rodrigues,

who looked, moved and sounded like a French Quarter priestess.

Over two-plus hours on Saturday night, only a few moments were less than

excellent. Cape Breton fiddle phenom Ashley MacIsaac displayed none of

the flashy, psychedelic panache touted in a recent New Yorker profile;

instead, he moved the audience with a deep, nontechnical "Slow Air &

Reels." Taking things in the opposite direction, West African soul diva

Angelique Kidjo commanded the audience to "clap with conviction" during

a song about a woman who marches up to the man she loves and tells him

she'll only marry him.

A pair of numbers featuring Tibetan flutist Nawang Khechog and

Navajo-Ute flutist R. Carlos Nakai sustained the most beautiful moments

of the night. Master of ceremonies Philip Glass said he believed it was

the first time the Tibetan flute and the American Indian flute had been

played together onstage. (The two musicians are working on an album to

be released later this year.) Whether or not he was right, "Universal

Peace" and "Meeting Place" brought an awesome hush upon the sellout

crowd.

Better-known faces delighted as well. David Byrne, in a flowing,

untucked tuxedo shirt, performed a yet-to-be-released number alone,

doing his best Roy Orbison imitation as he warbled about love and

longing. And Rufus Wainwright previewed his next album with "Poses," a

roiling piano song about a "young man who moves to the city and

basically prostitutes himself and becomes really ugly and nobody wants

him anymore." By way of further explanation, Wainwright disarmingly

offered this: "Basically, someone who didn't want to date me. So this is

my revenge."

Yet it was Smith who stole the show, as she did last year. She came out

midset for what has become a standard reading from Allen Ginsberg's

"Howl." When she finished, she spit on the stage. It was one of the few

seemingly extemporaneous moments on a night when the artists were, for

the most part, seized with reverence.

Later, Smith returned for a miniset with her longtime backing band and

exchanged playful quips with the audience, establishing a rapport that

was missing from the night's clichéd, "it's one of the honors of my

life" pronouncements. When a stagehand (in a jacket and tie, no less)

came out between songs to adjust one of her microphones, Smith muttered,

"the power of the unions," before rolling her eyes. More than 20 years

after she won over the New York intelligentsia, the grande dame of

American punk still has one of the most commanding stage presences in

music, whether she's squealing away on clarinet or shouting to the

world. Her band, including Lenny Kaye on guitar and Jay Dee Daugherty on

drums, did its best with an acoustically challenging situation. The

cavernous stage made the drums sound as if they were being played in the

back of a barn.

The night ended with a Smith sing-along. "The people have the power,"

she exclaimed, backed by Anastasio, Byrne, Rodrigues, Kidjo and

Wainwright, "to redeem the work of fools." To even ask whether Tibet

House, a New York charity dedicated to preserving Tibetan culture in the

face of the continued Chinese occupation of Tibet, will be able to

redeem the work of fools -- to say nothing of overcoming the hunger of

totalitarian regimes or the fury of deep-rooted ethnic hatreds -- is a

utopian question. But Saturday night, at least, it seemed like the right

one to ask.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

4. Studio chiefs battle China syndrome

----------------------------------------------------------------------

By Christopher Stern

WASHINGTON, Thursday February 10, 2000 (Variety) - Hollywood's studio

supremos are banding together to clear the way for widespread

distribution of U.S. features in China.

The China Trade Relations Committee includes moguls such as Walt Disney

Co. chairman Michael Eisner, News Corp chairman Rupert Murdoch, MGM

chairman Alex Yemenidjian, Sony Pictures chairman John Calley, Seagram

Co. CEO Edgar Bronfman Jr., Viacom Inc. chairman Sumner Redstone, Time

Warner chairman Gerald Levin and former MCA Inc chairman Lew Wasserman.

The goal of the committee is to lobby Congress to support permanent

normal trade relations with China and thus ingratiate the studios with

the Communist government.

Hollywood's top lobbyist, Motion Picture Assn. of America president Jack

Valenti formed the committee as part of his effort to open the huge

Chinese market to American film. ``We believe it is in the long-term

interests of our country that we put in place a sensible, enduring

relationship with the largest nation on earth,'' said Valenti.

That position is at odds with some in the Hollywood community who oppose

China's occupation of Tibet and are critical of the country's record

when it comes to human rights issues. Among the most vocal opponents is

Richard Gere, who is active in support of Tibetan freedom and who

starred in the MGM flop ``Red Corner,'' which offered up a harsh view of

the Chinese justice system.

Despite the opposition of such well-known talent, the studios are

determined to do their best to break down the Great Wall, at least when

it comes to film distribution.

Until recently there was an informal quota of only 10 major studio films

released each year in China. As part of the World Trade Organization

negotiations conducted last November, China agreed to increase the

number of U.S. films it would allow in to 20. But the conditions for

entry are severe. The Chinese government claims the lion's share of the

box office generated by the U.S. films. The eight major studio films

that were released in China last year generated less than $4 million in

revenue, according to the Motion Picture Assn., the international arm of

the MPAA.

___________________________________________________________________________

Send articles to: wtn-editors@tibet.ca

Subscriptions to: listserv@lists.mcgill.ca (SUB WTN-L [your name])

Cancellations to: listserv@lists.mcgill.ca (SIGNOFF WTN-L)

WTN Archived at: http://www.tibet.ca

___________________________________________________________________________

 
Argomenti correlati:
stampa questo documento invia questa pagina per mail