EU prepares for UN meeting - Human Rights and China
Wednesday 16 February, 2000 - Briefing MEPs on progress made in the year
by the EU in the area of Human Rights and indeed preparations under way
for the next session of the UN Commission to take place on 20 March
2000, Council President-in-Office Luis AMADO said all options were open
as far as the EU was concerned in taking a position on a Human Rights
resolution with regard to China, likely to be tabled by the USA. The
last attempt by the US failed when China used its veto, but Mr Amado
emphasised that the EU did expect to see some positive signs from China
on the Human Rights front. He held out the possibility of China agreeing
to a text on "economic and social" rights and said that a number of
Human Rights cases would be raised at the next meeting with China on 25
February. While the Chinese authorities had indicated a willingness to
take "positive steps", he had to confess that this willingness had not
been translated into positive action. Nevertheless, he emphasised his
support for the Commission's freedom of action on the Human Rights
front. He also pointed out that Human Rights issues, including
children's rights in a wide number of countries ranging from Iraq to the
Sudan had been discussed by Council over the past year.
Continuing the Human Rights theme, Commissioner Chris PATTEN
acknowledged that much remained to be done especially in what he felt
were the three problem areas of the death penalty, Cuba and China. He
expressed concern about the increasing number of people held in
detention in Cuba and said that the situation was being monitored
closely. Nevertheless, he emphasised that he did not support a policy
which would in effect isolate Cuba. Rather, he favoured measures that
would support the transition to democracy.
As far as China was concerned, despite the euro25bn trade surplus with
the EU, the Commission did not intend to remain silent. The problem was
to respond to the human rights situation in the most effective way.
Despite economic progress in China, there was what he termed "a dark
side" to the country especially where human rights was concerned. He
instanced the situation in Tibet and the case of the "Falun Gong".
Nevertheless, on the positive side he felt the "village governance"
programme was achieving results in promoting democracy at grassroots
levels. On a wider front, while China's decision to sign various UN
conventions on human rights was welcomed, he was now looking to
ratification. As far as the position of the individual EU member states
was concerned, he emphasised the need for more imagination and to adopt
a common position that could be maintained by all the countries
concerned. It was, he emphasised, vital to convince both the European
Parliament and voluntary groups as well as the public at large that
present policy with regard to China was in fact getting somewhere.