Radicali.it - sito ufficiale di Radicali Italiani
Notizie Radicali, il giornale telematico di Radicali Italiani
cerca [dal 1999]


i testi dal 1955 al 1998

  RSS
mar 13 mag. 2025
[ cerca in archivio ] ARCHIVIO STORICO RADICALE
Conferenza Transnational
Agora' Internet - 2 novembre 1994
SPEECH BY EMMA BONINO AT THE U.N.

From: Transnat.List@agora.stm.it

To: Multiple recipients of list

Subject: SPEECH BY EMMA BONINO AT THE U.N.

X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0 -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas

X-Comment: The Transnational Radical Party List

Basic comments excerpted from Emma Bonino statement to the 6th Committee of

the General Assembly.

After having expressed congratulations and thanks for the work carried out

by the International Law Commission and for the progress made on the issue

of the International Criminal Court on which the Committee has adopted the

draft statute and in the second reading of the draft Code of Crimes against

the Peace and Security of Mankind the Italian Delegate has expressed the

opinion that once the draft code is approved it should be put under the

Court's jurisdiction.

The Honourable Emma Bonino then expressed some complementary remarks in

order to address some issues that the document raises.

- The new draft prepared by the International Law Committee is a definite

improvement over last year 's draft. It is more complete and it integrates

issues which were still unsettled and insufficiently addressed. It is

flexible in reconciling the need of an effective Court and the respect of

state Sovereignty which is a basic point in deciding the General Assembly

course of action. There are therefore no reason for the UN to delay its

approval of an appropriate instrument which would respond to the spreading

of tragedies of entire populations and the blatant violations of

fundamental human rights.

More specifically:

- as it regards the establishment of the Court and its relationship with

the UN, the Italian Government supports the solution envisaged in the draft

statute based on a treaty commitment and on the conclusion of a

relationship agreement between the UN and the Presidency of the Court..

While the idea of amending the Charter to establish the Court as a

principal organ of the UN is appealing , it implies the risk of delays. The

Court should be established as a permanent institution which will meet only

when required to consider a case submitted to it.

- On the structure and the composition of the Court, the terminology has

been simplified by eliminating the reference to the "Tribunal" and the

method of selecting the judges seems to respond to the need of impartiality

and competence. However, the rigid distinction between recruiting the

judges on the basis of their criminal trial experience or of their

competence in international law could ultimately prevent the appointment of

persons with both qualifications. The separation of trial and of appellate

functions and the fundamental principles of independence of the judges and

of the members of the Procuracy are most welcomed.

- The new draft indicates a feasible way to balance different interest and

needs in respect to the most delicate questions faced by the ILC on the

Court's competence and the States 'acceptance of its jurisdiction, point

which is at the core of he entire statute. It abandons the distinction

between treaties which define crimes as international crimes and treaties

on the suppression of conduct constituting crimes under the national law

thereby eliminating an additional layer of complexity from the system.

Another improvement is the inclusion as Annexes of the Convention against

illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and the Convention against torture.

Moreover, the new Statute grants the Court specific jurisdiction over four

types of crimes : namely genocide, aggression, serious violation of the

laws and customs applied in armed conflict and crimes against humanity.

The precondition to the exercise of jurisdiction has been streamlined an

simplified. It is also considered appropriate that the Security Council

will be entitled to refer matters to the Court, as an alternative to

establishing ad hoc Tribunals, and approach which was considered positive

in the absence of Permanent Court but which cannot answer in every case to

crimes that affront the conscience of humankind.

In conclusion, while the improvements and the ideal structure of the

International Criminal Court could be discussed for ever the time is now to

take action and create rapidly a judiciary mechanism with the necessary

authority, operational structure and instruments to punish international

crimes or at least the most serious and dangerous of them.

The Draft Statute for the establishing of the Court is ready to be

discussed by governments with the view to finalising the instruments that

will establish this new jurisdictional body. This 49th General Assembly

should start procedure for establishing the International Criminal Court by

convening an International Conference in 1995. The international community

would show full respect for human dignity and avoid any responsibility for

hideous crimes wherever they are committed. The Italian Government will be

honoured to host such a Conference.

 
Argomenti correlati:
stampa questo documento invia questa pagina per mail