Radicali.it - sito ufficiale di Radicali Italiani
Notizie Radicali, il giornale telematico di Radicali Italiani
cerca [dal 1999]


i testi dal 1955 al 1998

  RSS
mer 19 mar. 2025
[ cerca in archivio ] ARCHIVIO STORICO RADICALE
Conferenza Transnational
Agora' Internet - 27 aprile 1995
Re: FLEMING'S FOLLY

From: Craig Harrison

To: Multiple recipients of list

Subject: Re: FLEMING'S FOLLY

X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0 -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas

X-Comment: The Transnational Radical Party List

I for one dropped out of the Dorry vs. everybody else CP thread when

it became clear what we agreed and disagreed on, given that the area

of disagreement concerned predictions of the outcomes of policy about

which nobody has real knowledge, with the predictable result that

reasoned argument gave way to rhetoric.

We both agree that CP at its present level has no discernible effect

on the murder rate, while an automatic (and prompt) execution of 100%

of convicted murderers, thereby increasing the rate of executions

from a few dozen to a few thousand a year, would have a dramatic

effect.

But that is where the difficulty begins. Most Americans say they

support CP, but would they support an increase such as this? And if

they didn't, juries would become reluctant to convict defendants of

murder. Right now, the criminal justice process leading to execution

a slow process indeed, partly due, Dorry claims to recalcitrant and

unelected justices thwarting the will of the people. As a result,

DA's are often reluctant even to ask for the death penalty (the O.J.

Simpson trial aside). Should we do away with separation of powers,

one of the fundamental principles of our Constitution? How can we

assure that accused murderers get a speedy and short trial and

execution if found guilty, without mangling the Constitution and

surrendering important freedoms (e.g. perhaps rules of evidence,

perhaps presumption of innocence, etc.) to say nothing of increasing

dramatically the execution of innocent people. Again, how can we be

sure that such measures would dramatically increase the hostility,

violence and militancy of the inner city poor against the rest of us,

especially given the current enthusiasm for dismantling the very

social programs which might defuse the situation--even now, the US

has the greatest disparity of income of *any* industrialized country,

while educational opportunities (including the GI bill) are

disappearing. These are important questions. I don't know the

answers. But I do know that they can't be anwered by rhetoric.

--Craig Harrison, San Francisco

 
Argomenti correlati:
stampa questo documento invia questa pagina per mail