theoretically speaking, to be a member of so called "public board" (who knows, what's this?) is probably not the same as to be editor-in-chief or member of editorial board. so, maybe (and i hope) mr. javlinskij even does not know what kind of position represents on the balkan question the paper printing his surmane in each issue. but nevertheless it could be interresting to know his opinion on the matter.maybe somebody "foreign" could write a letter (open?) to him, asking what he thinks about the original publications in "his" newspaper? maybe you, antonio?
for me it could be interresting also to see here some comments from maria ivanjan, who works in duma together with lepehin. what you think about it, masha?
but concerning luzhkov, mentioned by antonio, it's necessary to realize that now they represent a common team with javlinskij and in case of victory javlinskij is supposed to be president, while luzhkov will be apparently appointed to be prime minister.
who really will save russia?...
