Radicali.it - sito ufficiale di Radicali Italiani
Notizie Radicali, il giornale telematico di Radicali Italiani
cerca [dal 1999]


i testi dal 1955 al 1998

  RSS
lun 12 mag. 2025
[ cerca in archivio ] ARCHIVIO STORICO RADICALE
Conferenza Partito radicale
Depetro Alessandro - 16 agosto 1995
M E D I A R E P O R T

August 9, 1995.

[Source: London , with citations from Serb

journals and ]

Aug. 8 --POWER WARS AMONG BOSNIAN SERBS DRAMATICALLY HEAT UP, AS

RUMORS SPREAD OF IMMINENT MILOSEVIC-BACKED COUP AGAINST BOSNIAN

SERB LEADER RADOVAN KARADZIC.

The fighting between Karadzic and Bosnian Serb military

commander General Ratko Mladic took a new turn yesterday, when

Karadzic, citing his own supposed professional expertise as a

psychiatrist, demanded that Mladic be ousted, because he was

``crazy'' and ``a psychopath.'' Karadzic said he was best able

to judge the general's mental state.

The government-controlled press in Belgrade is becoming

more and more vociferous, in attacking Karadzic. ,

Serbia's leading daily, ran an article yesterday entitled,

``Karadzic -- point of no return.'' It declared that Karadzic,

``the gambler of Pale [Bosnian Serb capital], never made much money

playing cards, but in the political roulette he has undertaken, he

risks losing much more. He did not put just himself at stake, but

also a lot of Bosnian Serbs. His adventurism may destroy, yet, more

hundreds of thousands of people.''

Bratislav Grubabic, the editor of the well-informed Belgrade

newsletter , wrote: ``The only solution is for Mladic to

kill Karadzic, and accept the Contact Group plan.''

Tim Judah, London correspondent in

Belgrade, claims today that a military coup against Karadzic is

``imminent.... Sources in Pale said that tension was high....

There were also clear indications, that the military was shifting

its power base to Banja Luka in the north and, specifically, to

Dravar, where Gen. Mladic was yesterday reported to be commanding

battlefield operations.'' Judah reports that Mladic is accusing

the Bosnian Serb leadership of having contributed to the recent

days' fiascoes of Serb forces. He claims that many of its

leading lights have enriched themselves, while ordinary people

have been condemned to the prospect of war without end, and to

grinding poverty.

Aug. 8 --``THE BRITISH ARE VERY UPSET BY THE NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN

THE BALKANS, THEY WILL DO EVERYTHING TO MUDDY THE WATERS,

'' a London thinktank source of Balkans origin told today.

``What has happened, with the Croat offensive, is the end

of Britain's dream, which was to back the 'winner', namely the

Serbs, and to have a deal favoring a Greater Serbia,'' he

stressed. ``It's the same method they used in backing Tito

during World War Two. Now, they are doing everything to muddy

the waters. They are constantly putting forward rumors that a

division of Bosnia is about to happen. They are saying,

hypocritically, how worried they are about 'the poor Muslims' --

after having supported the Serbs for all these years! They want

to take the shine off the Croatian successes. They are spreading

rumors about new fighting in Eastern Slavonia.''

According to this source, it is the British who are really

behind the scheme announced by Russian President Boris Yeltsin,

for talks in Moscow between the Croat and Serb leaderships.

``This is the way I see British diplomacy now working. To me,

this Yeltsin proposal is very much British, in authorship. And

even if the British didn't literally write the script, they are

certainly backing the Russians. They would love to see, above

all else, the Bosnian-Croat alliance that the U.S. supports,

collapse, so they are fostering a Croat-Serb deal, brokered by

Russia.''

He said that British schemes for ``negotiations'' have,

otherwise, been thrown into disarray, by the behavior of European

Union negotiator Carl Bildt. ``That idiot Bildt, with his

attacks on Croatia based on unproven assertions, has stalled

whatever negotiations there might have been.''

[Catholic Press Agency, Zagreb, Croatia, Aug. 7, 1995]

CARDINAL FRANJO KUHARIC, the president of the Croatian

Conference of Bishops, addressed the public via Croatian TV on

Aug. 5, on the liberation of Croatian occupied territory in the

Krajina. Kuharic argued that the war to retake the Krajina, which

was an internationally recognized part of Croatia, fell under the

rubric of the doctrine of ``just war,'' as defined by the Second

Vatican Council and ``Gaudium et spes.''

Kuharic summarized the principles as follows:

* the damage inflicted by the aggressor on the nation or

community of nations must be lasting, grave and certain;

* all other means of putting an end to it must have been

shown to be impractical or ineffective;

* there must be serious prospects of success;

* the use of arms must not produce evils and disorders

graver than the evil to be eliminated.

Cardinal Kuharic concluded by supporting the manifesto

issued by Croatian President Tudjman on the occasion of retaking

Krajina, and by appealing to the consciences of the Croatian

defenders to uphold them and bring an end to war as soon as

possible.

[TWRA, August 8, 1995, Daily Bulletin]

At a press conference in Zagreb today, the vice-president

of the Croatian Government, Ivica KOSTOVIC, said that a corridor

had been opened to the enclave of Bihac, and that the first

humanitarian convoy in months was starting out today.

Reacting to the press rumors about the fate of refugees,

Kostovic stressed that, during the military operation, there were

19 civilian casualties in all.

Kostovic said only 200 people have been detained, and that

the Red Cross will have access to them and to refugee centers. He

also gave figures for how many other civilians had fled, which

varied significantly by area.

[TWRA, Aug. 8, 1995, Daily Bulletin]

Croatian President Franjo TUDJMAN opened official talks with

the president and foreign minister of Bosnia-Herzegovina today,

by presenting them with medals for their contributions to

friendly relations between Sarajevo and Zagreb. President

Izetbegovic received the ``grand order of Queen Jelena with

ribbon,'' and Foreign Minister Sacirbey, the ``Count Branimir

Order with necklace.'' Attending the ceremony were the ambassadors

of the U.S., Turkey, and Germany.

[TWRA, Aug. 8, 1995, Daily Bulletin}

The party of Serbian Vuka Draskovic, and the Synod of the

Serbian Orthodox Church have both begun agitation against the

government of Milosevic. Draskovic's Serbian National Revival and

National party has been demonstrating for 3 nights, and throwing

rocks at the parliament and the U.S. and German embassies.

The Synod has released a statement attacking the

``neo-communist leadership'' and calling for union of all

opponents of Milosevic.

[Source: Washington Times, by Peter Benesh, London, Aug. 8]

BRITS PUSH BOSNIA PARTITION LINE; TUDJMAN SPOKESMAN

DENOUNCES FAKE MAP. The Times of London yesterday published a

drawing of a map, attributed to Croatian President Franjo

Tudjman, which shows Bosnia partitioned in two, with half going

to Serbia and the other half to Croatia. A spokesman for Tudjman

denounced the map as a fake.

The London Times said that Tudjman drew the map on a menu

at the request of Liberal Democratic Party leader Paddy Ashdown

during a May 6 V-E Day banquet in London -- a banquet attended by

Queen Elizabeth. The map, as reproduced on the front page of the

Washington Times under the headlines ``Dividing the Spoils'' and

``Croat leader's map erases Bosnia,'' shows Bosnia severed along

a S-shaped divide, with the eastern part marked with an arrow

saying ``Serbia,'' and the western part with an arrow marked

``Croatia.''

In Zagreb, a government spokesman, Natasha Rajahovic, said

that Croatia has no plans to annex Bosnia, and said that the map

``is entirely false. It is not his handwriting on that

drawing.... The President never drew that map.... There will be

measures taken to prove that.... We have witnesses.''

Bosnia's Foreign Minister Muhamed Sacirbey is quoted as

telling Reuters that his government has asked the Croatian

government for clarification, but then the Washington Times

quotes Sacirbey as saying: ``There are cynics who might see

Croatia going from being a victim to being a menace. There's

always a reason for caution.... But I think we should

concentrate on our shared strategic interests and not speculate

about a Croatia that has opened its mouth wide to swallow

Bosnia.''

WASHINGTON, AUGUST 7 --US STATE DEPARTMENT SPOKESMAN ASKED ABOUT

THE RUMORS IN THE EUROPEAN PRESS about a possible deal between

Serbian President Milosevic and Croatian President Tudjman and about

the strength and stability of the Bosnian-Croatian Federation.

Johnson said:

``Well, I'm not going to be able to be a crystal ball gazer

for you. We worked very hard to try to put the federation

together, and we've worked hard since then in a number of ways to

try to keep it intact. I'm not going to speculate about what

type of pressures might be on it. It, we think, has been a

successful diplomatic outcome that we are pleased to have played

a part in bringing into play, but I'm not in a position to try to

tell you what sort of pressures might be on it in the future.''

Regarding the Yeltsin invitation to Tudjman and Milosevic,

Johnson said, ``We have had conversations with the Russians We

are in the process of learning more about the details of what

President Yeltsin proposes to put forward. We hope to learn more

of those details before we give you a fuller reaction to how that

might play a role in a negotiated solution.''

Aug. 8 --``KRAJINA'' SERB PRIME MINISTER MILAN MARTIC REPORTED DEAD.

According to a London source of Balkans origin, Martic was killed by

his own troops, following the humiliating Serb defeat at the hands of

the Croatians. Other accounts, from British and continental European

radio, claim that Martic has committed suicide. In one dispatch,

BBC claimed that Martic was in disfavor with Serbian dictator

Slobodan Milosevic, the latter preferring Krajina ``President''

Milan Babic as his agent.

Martic has (had) a colorful past. According to published

accounts in the early 1990s, he had formerly been the psychiatric

patient of Dr. Jovan Raskovic, the Croatian Serb demagogue who

first launched the war of rebellion against Croatia, on behalf of

his Belgrade-backed ``Serbian Democratic Party'', in the 1990-91

period. Raskovic, now deceased, was the conceptual/political

architect of the Krajina rebellion. Martic was, thereby, one of

a pack of psychopaths conducting the Serb insurgencies and

massacres. This also includes, of course, Bosnian Serb leader

Dr. Radovan Karadzic, who is a protege of the late Raskovic, and

others. Raskovic deployed many of his former patients into

``politics.''

Aug. 8 --``WHY SHOULD TUDJMAN HAVE TO PLEAD WITH MILOSEVIC FOR A DEAL?''

a well-informed London strategist, himself of Balkans origin, asked

rhetorically, during a discussion today. He was attempting to throw

cold water on all the British-spawned speculation that some kind of

deal is about to be arranged between the Croatian and Serbian leaders,

in which Bosnian interests will be sold out.

``Formerly, Tudjman had to act out of weakness, so he did a

lot of opportunistic things,'' the source noted. ``But it is the

wrong perception, to think he will just jump into a deal, now....

The Serbs, after all, are very much weakened. Their hopes for a

Greater Serbia are receding. They are the ones who will be

squealing for negotiations. There is a constant Serb power

struggle going on. Besides, militarily, the most likely thing to

happen, is that we will see further pushes by BOTH the Croatians

and the Bosnians in the coming period. The Bosnians can now gain

quite a bit, there are a lot of empty spaces. And they will get

more arms, and more quickly, to their side.'' Besides, he

repeatedly stressed, the U.S. has been unambiguous in its support

for a Croat-Muslim alliance.

[Source: London ]

Aug. 8 ()--BRITISH DEFENSE SECRETARY MICHAEL PORTILLO IN

``CLASH WITH WASHINGTON AND BONN,'' as he attacks the

Croatian offensive in Krajina, the London reports

front-page today. The says that Portillo's comments

``differed sharply'' with those of leading American officials.

The British Defense Secretary, a protege of Baroness

Thatcher, said: ``Where people are driven from their homes, and

where they have lived in those places for generations, that

amounts to ethnic cleansing. Of course, the warring parties

(sic) believe that if you shift enough people around the map, you

can eventually arrive at territorial integrity which will be the

basis for some sort of settlement. From the West's point of

view, a conclusion which is based on shifting hundreds of

thousands of people, and in the process killing tens of thousands

more, is just not an acceptable way of moving towards a peace

settlement.''

The Brute went on: ``The difficulty with this conflict, has

always been to try and get more than one party to agree, that it

is in their interests to negotiate a peace, rather than just to

seize more and more territory. The object of international

efforts must be to bring the parties to the negotiating table, to

establish a map, to establish a ceasefire, and then allow the UN

to police that ceasefire, and continue its humanitarian work.''

end report.

 
Argomenti correlati:
stampa questo documento invia questa pagina per mail