Radicali.it - sito ufficiale di Radicali Italiani
Notizie Radicali, il giornale telematico di Radicali Italiani
cerca [dal 1999]


i testi dal 1955 al 1998

  RSS
mar 15 lug. 2025
[ cerca in archivio ] ARCHIVIO STORICO RADICALE
Conferenza Partito radicale
Partito Radicale Radical Party - 21 febbraio 1999
KOSOVO BRIEFING #49 - FEBRUARY 19, 1999

Kosovo Briefing, a bulletin on human rights, humanitarian and security

developments on Kosovo, is issued by the Open Society Institute (Washington

Office).OSI issues separately Serbia Watch, a bulletin on civil society,

political and economic developments in Serbia and Montenegro. Please

communicate any questions, comments or requests to receive Kosovo Briefing

or Serbia Watch to Jay Wise at (202) 496-2401, fax: (202) 296-5381,

or Note: Place names rendered primarily in Serbian spelling

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------

"The endgame of the Kosovo negotiations...is being played where many

skeptics of the Rambouillet negotiations expected it would be: in Belgrade."

The Washington Post, February 18, 1999 - Rambouillet

"[The rules set for Rambouillet] are obviously being re-written, and if

[the Americans] are talking with Milosevic, it is obvious in whose favor

they are being rewritten."

Unnamed Kosovo Albanian delegate at Rambouillet

Quoted by Times (London), February 18, 1999 - Rambouillet

"He's still pretty negative, but he isn't closing the door completely."

Unnamed diplomatic source on Milosevic

Quoted by the Guardian (London) , February 19, 1999 - Rambouillet

"No NATO force is a deal breaker from our perspective... If there is no

agreement, then the Serbs need to know that we had said earlier whatever

side cratered the talks would be held responsible... And in the Serb case,

that means it would be followed by NATO bombing."

US Secretary of State Madeleine Albright

February 16, 1999 - Washington

"The agreements reached within NATO imply that military action will not be

automatic... If the Allies agree on use of force, in accordance with the

principles laid down in the UN Security Council resolutions, we would also

have to ask this question: What is the political objective?"

France's Defense Minister Alain Richard

Quoted by Agence France Presse, February 18, 1999 - Paris

"I hope with all my heart that both sides will understand that it is in

their interest to find an agreement because the side which does not

understand then would have to bear all the consequences, which would be

very serious for them and for their country."

France's President Jacques Chirac

February 19, 1999 - Washington

"We're waiting for one word from the big man."

Unnamed diplomat at Rambouillet on Milosevic

Quoted by Reuters, February 19, 1999 - Rambouillet

"No."

US Presidential spokesman Joe Lockhart, on whether mediators in France

would consider extending a February 20 deadline for a settlement in Rambouillet

Quoted by Agence France Presse, February 19, 1999 - Washington

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

------

International news agencies reported US negotiator Chris Hill was

returning from Belgrade, after Yugoslavia's President Slobodan Milosevic

refused to meet with him today, and continued to insist he would not allow

foreign troops in Kosovo. Reuters quoted US State Department spokesman

James Rubin: "There can be no half-way agreement... It is hard to be

encouraged by the Serbian position at this time."

The International Helsinki Federation reported today that "since the

beginning of the Rambouillet Peace Conference on February 5, 1999, at least

18 Albanians have been killed, most of them by Serbian forces, while others

have been found dead in enigmatic and yet unclarified circumstances after

having been reported disappeared or kidnapped."

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------

I. CONTACT GROUP INTERIM AGREEMENT ON KOSOVO

* Security, implementation annexes final?

In a Rambouillet "situation report," the Balkan Action Council

(Washington) said yesterday that a Thursday draft of the Contact Group

negotiators' plan on security forces and a NATO implementation force within

Kosovo "makes reference to 2,500 Ministry of Interior special police

allowed to remain for up to two years, as had been foreshadowed in the

January 27 pre-conference draft. The military annex, however, has increased

the number of federal army troops permitted to remain indefinitely in

Kosovo for border patrolling from 1,500 to 2,500 by allotting an additional

1,000 troops for 'headquarters' and 'support' personnel."

The draft of the annex on security calls for "other forces" [forces other

than KFOR -- the likely name of a NATO implementation force in Kosovo --

Yugoslav Army, Serbian Interior Ministry forces, or local police] not to

carry weapons within a kilometer of Kosovo's main roads, still-to-be

determined MUP and VJ cantonment sites, and the border zone. The forces

must within 30 days of KFOR's deployment canton all weapons measuring 12.7

mm or larger and cease wearing military uniforms and insignia. Within 90

days, possession of large weapons or automatic weapons is illegal.

The military annex also calls for the withdrawal of all Serbian

anti-terrorist "special police" units; however, remaining Yugoslav Army

(VJ) and Interior Ministry (MUP) forces are required only to turn in

weapons larger than 82mm (Howitzers and other artillery), and are not

prohibited from bearing automatic weapons. VJ and MUP forces are also

given, respectively, 90 and 60 days in which to halve their current

deployments, and 180 and 120 days in which to bring forces down to levels

described above. All Serbian air defense weapons must be withdrawn no more

than 10 days after the entry into force of the agreement.

The Washington Post reported today that "Yugoslavia might also gain

greater flexibility on military matters included in any peace settlement,

such as an increase in the number of troops it would be allowed to position

along Kosovo's border with Albania."

BETA yesterday quoted that KLA political representative Adem Demaci:

"Disarmament is out of the question and the KLA will be the army of the

state of Kosovo." Agence France Presse reported yesterday the KLA general

staff also issued a statement on disarmament: "As long as other peoples

have their organized armed forces, the KLA will remain the army of the

people of Kosovo." The New York Times Wednesday reported Kosovo Albanian

negotiator Veton Surroi "said the KLA...should be allowed to keep some kind

of 'officer structure... It is my feeling you cannot go from an existing

stage to expect the whole thing to disband. There should be a midway."

* Political dimension of peace plan completed?

Reuters reported yesterday that "the troika of negotiators told reporters

they had handed the two parties Thursday a "final" draft of political

proposals... Diplomats said neither side was happy with the result."

Reuters also noted that after receiving new proposals by the Serbian

delegation incorporated by the international community into a draft

agreement, "ethnic Albanians were seething...they said [the proposals]

entrenched Yugoslav sovereignty and territorial integrity."

The most recent draft of the Kosovo interim agreement proposed by the

international community includes a phrase "desiring to establish

institutions of democratic self-government in Kosovo grounded in respect

for the territorial integrity and sovereignty of the Federal Republic of

Yugoslavia, from which the authorities of governance set forth herein

originate." The Times (London) reported the addition of "an upper house [to

Kosovo's new parliament] containing members from all of Kosovo's ethnic

communities, with the threshold for representation reduced from 5% to .5%.

President Milosevic is said to have insisted on such a body, through which

he hopes to put a brake on the power of the proposed Albanian-dominated

lower House."

Reuters reported today Hasim Thaci, head Kosovo Albanian negotiator

"reportedly criticized the final draft agreement as so heavily weighted

toward the Serbs that he feared conference sponsors were setting up the

ethnic Albanians for blame if talks fail."

The New York Times today cited Fillippo di Robilant, an adviser to the

Albanian delegation, who said "the ethnic Albanian delegation...was unhappy

with a proposal to add a second chamber to the new legislature, in effect

potentially giving the Serbs veto power."

The Times (London) yesterday cited a European official who "said '...if

the KLA does not renounce independence, then there will be no NATO troops

in Kosovo.' He hoped that the ethnic Albanian negotiators...would accept

this principle, on the condition that the international community

guaranteed a Kosovo review conference in three, or preferably five years'

time." The New York Times reported today that diplomats "made clear...that

the political aspects of the peace settlement would not be the deal

breaker." United Press International reported yesterday that the "ethnic

Albanians are said to have given up one of their key demands, a national

referendum."

ARTA reported Wednesday: "[One Western diplomat speculated that]

'Albanians could organize the referendum after three or five years without

asking anyone'... Their referendum would be accepted if conditions were

appropriate for it, and if they could prove to the West they would not be a

destabilizing factor in the Balkans, but on the contrary a guarantor of

peace in the Balkans, having in mind here in particular Macedonia."

Reuters also yesterday cited an adviser to the Albanian delegation: "This

draft is so bad the Albanian side may well not sign it on Saturday... It's

getting messy."

The Guardian (London) reported today that "tough talks are also expected

over the appointment of a civilian representative for Kosovo, with the

Serbs strongly opposed to the American candidate, William Walker."

The Washington Times reported today that it had yet to be determined how

much an autonomous Kosovo would look like Yugoslavia: "For instance, would

it use the Yugoslav dinar?"

* Diplomats head to Belgrade with threats, concessions...

Reuters today cited a US diplomat saying Yugoslavia's President Slobodan

Milosevic "refused to see US envoy Chris Hill, who flew to Belgrade Friday

in a last-ditch effort to save the peace talks... 'If these guys are

bluffing, they are doing a very good job,' the diplomat, who is close to

the peace talks, said." Agence France Presse today reported that "US

Secretary of State Albright and her counterparts from France and Britain

might head to Belgrade at the weekend...western diplomats...said Friday.

'Nothing is ruled out, nothing is ruled in,' a European diplomat close to

the talks said."

Hill traveled Wednesday with British and French representatives, and

Serbian negotiator Nikola Sainovic to meet with Milosevic. US State

Department spokesman James Foley said Wednesday that Hill "delivered a very

clear message to President Milosevic...to come to terms now" with the

threat of NATO air strikes. Agence France Presse reported February 17 that

"a Western diplomatic source close to the Rambouillet conference,

said...that 'the talks lasted just about four hours.' "

The Times (London) reported yesterday that "the unilateral American move

so distressed Wolfgang Petrisch, the European Union envoy and mediator,

that he chased Mr. Hill's car to the airport on Tuesday in a vain attempt

to stop [Hill's] aircraft from taking off for Belgrade... [a source close

the Albanian delegation said]...that Boris Mayorsky, the Russian mediator,

was tempted to leave Rambouillet after he heard about the Belgrade visit.

The Russians made formal protests yesterday to America, France and Britain

yesterday, all of which had representatives on the secret Belgrade

shuttle." The Times (London) reported yesterday that "Albanian delegates

denounced the Rambouillet peace talks outside Paris after they learnt that

Nikola Sainovic, the main Serbian negotiator, had flown to Belgrade with

Chris Hill...breaking the fundamental confinement rules of the conference."

White House spokesman Joe Lockhart said today that "it would be a serious

mistake for [Belgrade] to walk away from the process... They need to

understand the consequences should they decide to walk away."

The Washington Post reported today that "with a clock ticking toward a

Saturday deadline [set by the Contact Group for Serbian and Yugoslav

government delegates to sign an interim status agreement for Kosovo with a

Kosovo Albanian delegation] Western diplomatic sources said [Yugoslav

President Slobodan] Milosevic was being offered some possible incentives to

agree to a peace accord, such as relief from political and economic

sanctions, including a ban on participation in international financial

institutions."

US Secretary of State Madeleine Albright said yesterday on the Newshour

with Jim Lehrer that she had spoken on the phone yesterday with Milosevic:

"I made very clear to him that time was running out, that there is a

deadline...for an agreement to be reached... I am generally concerned that

the military side of the talks is not really progressing."

The Washington Post report also noted that "the principal stumbling block

to achieving an agreement...remains the Serb-led Belgrade government's

opposition to accepting a NATO-l;ed force of 28,000 peacekeeping troops on

Serbian soil."

In a February 13 meeting, the Contact Group extended by a week the

original February 13 deadline.

Reuters reported yesterday that "Serbian sources say Milosevic wants

financial and diplomatic sanctions against Yugoslavia lifted and an

understanding that he will not be indicted as a suspected war criminal.

Diplomats say the West could not guarantee him immunity from prosecution

since that would undermine the independence of the...tribunal, but some

have speculated that Western powers might privately make clear they would

not offer prosecutors evidence against Milosevic."

United Press International noted yesterday that "diplomats said Belgrade

is meanwhile seeking the readmission of Yugoslavia to the United Nations,

to the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe...and an end to

international economic sanctions." Associated Press reported Yugoslavia's

deputy Prime Minister Vuk Draskovic Wednesday "said any agreement must

include the lifting of all sanctions against our country, including our

full membership in all European and international organizations and forums."

US State Department spokesman James Foley said Wednesday that "Serb

policies in Kosovo are on of the several elements that are tied to the

outer wall of sanctions, not, certainly, the only one."

The New York Times reported today that "a senior Clinton administration

official said...that Washington had not made any hints that it would

consider easing sanctions."

British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook and France's Foreign Minister Hubert

Vedrine in a letter addressed to the people of Yugoslavia and sent to

independent news service BETA yesterday, said that Milosevic had a chance

to "either end the conflict and bring Yugoslavia into the family of modern

European nations, or thrust it once again into a cycle of internal

conflicts and isolation."

The Financial Times noted that Russia's envoy to the talks at Rambouillet,

Boris Mayorski, yesterday "dissociated himself and his country from any

military presence in Kosovo. He denounced as 'blatant lies' reports that

Russia was trying to persuade [Yugoslav President] Slobodan Milosevic...to

accept a NATO force."

* ...amid negative signs from Belgrade...

Reuters today quoted Yugoslavia's President Milosevic speaking to a

visiting Cypriot delegation: "[Yugoslavia] will not give up Kosovo, even if

we are bombed... Threats of bombarding our country if it does not allow

foreign occupation of its territory should be a warning for the whole world."

Independent Radio B-92 (Belgrade) reported yesterday that Socialist Party

spokesman Ivica Dacic "told a press conference that the deployment of

foreign troops without approval would be considered an act of aggression or

occupation and Belgrade would respond accordingly. Dacic declined to answer

whether it was possible that Yugoslav authorities could give their assent

to the arrival of foreign troops to secure any agreement made at

Rambouillet." Agence France Presse reported that "this is the first time

that a senior Serb official has raised, even indirectly, the possibility of

Belgrade's agreement to the deployment of an international peace force in

the Serbian province of Kosovo."

Associated Press today quoted Dragan Tomic, Serbia's parliament speaker

and a close ally of Milosevic: "Under no circumstances, absolutely out of

the question, should foreign troops be in Kosovo to enforce any political

agreement'... Sources close to the Serbian delegation at the talks said if

the pressure continues, they might consider allowing foreign troops in

Kosovo, but only if they did not include soldiers from 'unfriendly' nations

like the United States, Germany, Britain and France. Americans would never

accept such Serbian conditions, a senior Western diplomat said." Serbia's

President Milan Milutinovic said Wednesday that the only circumstance under

which Yugoslavia would accept NATO troops would be "only if we were a

member of NATO."

Following Hill's meeting Tuesday with Milosevic, state-owned news agency

Tanjug reported a Milosevic statement: "Our negative stand on the presence

of foreign troops is not only the attitude of the leadership, but also of

all the citizens of our country." However, Britain's Foreign Minister Robin

Cook noted that "Milosevic rarely confines himself to saying as brief as

saying no, and we are quite clear that there have been instructions given

to the Serb delegation with respect to that."

Agence France Presse reported yesterday that "Serb sources close to the

talks said 'frantic' discussions were taking place in Belgrade... The Serb

sources...said there was no clue whether Milosevic would back down... 'We

believe he'll make a decision in the last 24 hours before a deadline,' one

source said." Reuters yesterday cited a Serbian source saying Serbia's

President Milan Milutinovic "would return to Rambouillet from Belgrade

Thursday [after leaving Rambouillet the day before] 'in good faith and

fairly optimistic.' "

The New York Times reported today that "a senior European diplomat

involved in the negotiations, who knows Serbia well, said that top officers

in the Yugoslav army had told Milosevic that it would be very difficult for

the military to recover from air strikes against air defense system in

Serbia and Kosovo... Yugoslavia is economically weak and could not afford

to repair the damage to its military installations."

*...as deadline for talks approaches

Agence France Presse yesterday quoted an unnamed European source on the

negotiations: "Everybody is very, very clear, it's a firm deadline."

However, the Washington Post noted today that "if the final hours produce

signs that Milosevic is willing to make concessions, senior Western

officials said it was possible that the Saturday deadline might be

postponed by a day or two." Reuters reported Wednesday that "a senior

American official in Washington, speaking on condition of anonymity, said

that if the Serbs agreed to the NATO force, an extension of the talks

beyond the Saturday deadline might be considered to clear up some of the

remaining unresolved issues."

Agence France Presse reported today that "a source at the [KVM] mission

told AFP that half its 1,200 foreigners...could be evacuated later Friday,

with the others to follow on Saturday. The New York Times reported today

that KVM personnel "would drive out of Kosovo starting Sunday if the peace

talks failed, a NATO official said. The monitors...would have to leave

before air strikes could begin." Agence France Presse also reported that

"Britain and France joined Germany [today] in advising their nationals to

leave Yugoslavia at once and announced they would evacuate non-essential

staff from their embassies in Belgrade."

The US State Department announced yesterday that Secretary of State

Albright "plans to return to France on February 20 to urge both sides in

the negotiations at Rambouillet to seize this opportunity to achieve an

interim settlement agreement for Kosovo" but did not mention whether

Albright would actually travel to Rambouillet, noting that "the full

schedule of the Secretary's meetings in France has yet to be determined."

The Times (London) reported today that "the hottest whisper...beyond the

chateau gates was that Richard Holbrooke...was about to bring his messianic

touch to the talks."

* Allies still wrangling over threat of force

Agence France Presse quoted US Secretary of State Albright Tuesday: "No

NATO force is a deal breaker from our perspective... If there is no

agreement, then the Serbs need to know that we had said earlier whatever

side cratered the talks would be held responsible... And in the Serb case,

that means it would be followed by NATO bombing." The Washington Times

yesterday cited an unnamed senior US administration official: "If the Serbs

block what we feel is indispensable - a KFOR, or Kosovo implementation

force - that will emphatically trigger military force including air strikes

that are already in place." Agence France Presse reported that US deputy

Secretary of State Strobe Talbott told east European journalists in a

satellite interview that the only language [Yugoslavia's President

Milosevic understands] is force."

Reuters reported yesterday that NATO Secretary-General Javier Solana told

reporters during a visit to Sarajevo that "NATO will have all the political

support" to launch air strikes against Belgrade. Earlier, Solana while in

Macedonia said that "if a political solution is not reached, then we say

very clearly that NATO knows very well what it has to do."

US Secretary of State Albright said yesterday when asked about Solana's

authority to conduct air strikes that "[Solana] will clearly consult in an

informal way with...the Contact Group and a variety of countries... I think

it's very important to know that he has that authority already." The Times

(London) reported yesterday that recent comments by European diplomats

"appeared to rule out early NATO air strikes against Serbia if the talks

fail by 'high noon' on Saturday... The French still argue a full Contact

group meeting should be held before NATO bombers can be unleashed."

The Washington Post reported today that "NATO diplomats acknowledge there

are lingering anxieties among some European allies about the wisdom of

launching air strikes, especially in the absence of any explicit authority

from the UN Security Council... NATO diplomats said there were concerns

within the alliance about whether air strikes could backfire on Western

strategy... 'The alliance has always said it did not want to serve as the

KLA's air force,' a senior NATO diplomat said. 'But if we start bombing and

the Albanians see the chance to gain independence on the ground, there is

little hope they would come back to negotiations even if Milosevic had a

change of heart.' "

Agence France Presse cited a report today by state-run news agency Tanjug

(Belgrade) that Serbia's President Milan Milutinovic in an "urgent" message

to the Contact Group requested "protection against the repeated pressures

for our delegation to accept the so-called military annex,' that is the

stationing of foreign troops with a view to 'applying the accord,' drawn up

by the Contact Group.

Associated Press reported yesterday that France's Defense Minister Alain

Richard "said NATO will not automatically take military action against

Yugoslavia if an agreement is reached. 'The situation will have to be

evaluated,' Richard was quoted as saying in the interview being published

Friday in [Paris weekly] Le Figaro." Agence France Presse reported

yesterday that Richard also said: "The agreements reached within NATO imply

that military action will not be automatic... If the Allies agree on use of

force, in accordance with the principles laid down in the UN Security

Council resolutions, we would also have to ask this question: What is the

political objective?"

Deutsche Presse Agentur Wednesday cited a NATO official who "said...if the

talks failed, the NATO Council would meet Saturday afternoon. Air strikes

would be on the agenda,' said the official."

The Times (London) reported yesterday that "European diplomats close to

the Kosovo talks warned America yesterday to 'stop treating Serbia like

Iraq'... Their comments disclosed the increasing dissent within the Contact

Group, in which there is a rift over how best to coerce President

Milosevic... one [European] official...said that he was embarrassed by the

US Secretary of State's 'unfortunate' statement that, by not signing the

Kosovo peace deal, Mr. Milosevic risked almost immediate NATO retaliation.

'You have to stop the NATO drums of war. From time to time you have to calm

these people down a little.' "

Russia's President Boris Yeltsin, when asked today about the possible use

of force against Serbia to compel Belgrade to sign a peace agreement on

Kosovo, said that "I gave Clinton my opinion in a letter, and by telephone,

that [military action against Belgrade] won't pass. We will not let Kosovo

be touched."

Agence France Presse quoted White House spokesman PJ Crowley: "We are

confused by these reports...there has not been any communication between

the two presidents in the last 24 hours."

Reuters yesterday quoted US National Security Council spokesman David

Leavy saying that "we're aware that Russia has opposed the use of force in

Kosovo... But we've also made clear that should the Serbs refuse to comply

and refuse to sign a political settlement, that NATO has to consider

military action in its own interests, in the interests of the region and

the interests of the United States, and we will do so." Reuters reported

that US Secretary of State Albright and Norway's Foreign Minister Knut

Vollebaek "both spoke to Russia's foreign minister Igor Ivanov Thursday and

urged him to put pressure on Milosevic to accept a NATO ground force to

help implement a peace deal."

Reuters reported yesterday that "The Canadian and British embassies said

they would start withdrawing staff as the Saturday deadline approached...

[an unnamed US diplomat said] the US embassy was 'intensively planning a

potential departure'...but no orders had been given to leave as had been

the case in October ahead of similar threats." Agence France Presse

yesterday reported OSCE spokeswoman in Pristina Beatrice Lacoste "told AFP

that without an accord, or the prospect of one, then the mission would

leave. But she said there was no evacuation plan at present."

US Secretary of State Albright told reporters yesterday that "we are

beginning planning for evacuation, not only of [hundreds of Kosovo

monitors] but also of our people at our embassies in advance of NATO air

strikes."

* NATO examines strike options...

Reuters yesterday quoted an unnamed US official saying " 'there has been

talk about using Tomahawk missiles from US Navy ships in the Adriatic and

Mediterranean in any NATO operation'... [Another military official]

suggested that an initial strike of perhaps 50 Tomahawks could send a sharp

message to...Milosevic without immediately risking US and allied

warplanes." Associated Press said yesterday a senior Pentagon official said

"an attack would be likely to begin with scores of Tomahawk cruise missiles

launched from ships and submarines in the Mediterranean and Adriatic... The

first targets would be Serbia's strong air defense system with more than

600 anti-aircraft batteries across Yugoslavia, radar stations, and command

and control posts...opinion is divided among NATO officials about a second

wave [using bombers and fighter jets]."

Agence France Presse reported today that "successive waves of air attacks,

drawing on US carrier-based and land-based aircraft in Europe, would

quickly follow with little or now pause between them under the plans

preferred by NATO Supreme Commander General Wesley Clark."

Associated Press yesterday quoted US Defense Secretary Cohen: "[Air

strikes] would reduce some of [Milosevic's] ability to pose the kind of

threat that he has posed to the Kosovar people. It would be designed to

take down some of the assets that pose the most immediate threat to the

Kosovars."

Agence France Presse cited NATO Secretary-General Javier Solana from

Skopje, Macedonia following a meeting with Macedonia's Prime Minister,

Ljubco Georgievsky: "If negotiations fail, NATO knows very well what it is

going to do."

*... as US moves forces into place

The US Defense Department issued a statement February 17 saying Defense

Secretary Cohen had ordered the deployment of US-based aircraft to Europe

in support of potential NATO operations: "These previously designated

forces are deploying to their forward staging bases in Europe to increase

their readiness status for potential air operations over the Federal

Republic of Yugoslavia... These aircraft are part of a total of about 260

aircraft that the United States committed to support air operations

developed by NATO last fall. Most of the U.S. combat aircraft committed to

the NATO effort are stationed at bases in Europe or aboard the aircraft

carrier USS Enterprise now deployed in the Mediterranean Sea. Aircraft of

European allies are also committed to possible operations and are being

readied at bases in Europe. Deploying aircraft include 12 F117 Nighthawk

stealth fighters, 10 EA6B Prowlers, four KC10 refuelers, and 25 KC135

refuelers. Additional U.S. aircraft, including bombers, remain in a standby

posture in the United States in case they are needed to support the operation."

* KFOR mission coming into focus

Reuters reported Wednesday: "NATO officials said military chiefs had

approved Operation Joint Guardian late Tuesday and NATO ambassadors,

meeting on a daily basis at alliance headquarters in Brussels, would give

it the green light later Wednesday. 'This will give us a detailed plan

ready for implementation,' [a] NATO official said, adding that the advance

force would be sent to Kosovo 'within hours' of any peace deal requiring

NATO implementation. That initial force would include the 2,300-strong,

primarily French, extraction force in Macedonia, a US Marine expeditionary

unit currently aboard the USS Nassau in the Adriatic, and elements of

NATO's German-based Allied Rapid Reaction Corps under British

Lieutenant-General Michael Jackson. 'That's 5,000-6,000 people in total

available for immediate deployment,' the NATO official said."

Reuters also noted that "Montenegro said earlier it would allow NATO

forces to use the Adriatic port of Bar to deploy peacekeeping troops into

Kosovo... NATO allies Britain, Germany, France and Italy were also shipping

equipment to Greece for four mechanized battalions to support the advance

force within a few days, officials said. 'We want to limit to a minimum the

time between the signatures on an agreement and K-day, the beginning of

NATO-led implementation,' an alliance official said. 'We want to avoid a

vacuum that could be exploited by either party to undermine or unravel any

peace settlement.' "

ARTA rerported Wednesday that the most recent NATO plan called for the

following division of responsibilities in Kosovo: "Pristina will belong to

the British, the border with Albania will be secured by the Americans, the

Italians will own the northern part of Kosovo, whereas the French will

enjoy themselves in the deep south."

II. DISPLACED PERSONS/KILLINGS/ATTACKS ON CIVILIANS/POPULATION CENTERS UNDER

SIEGE

*Situation worsening for aid organizations, personnel

Reuters Wednesday cited ethnic Albanian sources "[saying] a Kosovo

Albanian aid worker was found guilty on Wednesday of helping separatist

guerrillas and was sentenced to seven months time served, ethnic Albanian

sources said. Fatime Boshnjaku, 45, was arrested in mid-July while

delivering a vanload of food... The trial...has been postponed twice due to

unspecified 'security reasons' but a verdict and sentence were finally

handed down Wednesday... Wilfried Wesch, of the KVM [Kosovo Verification

Mission] in Djakovica, has described the arrest of Boshnjaku as an obvious

attempt to intimidate local aid workers."

Agence France Presse reported February 15 that "Serbian police seized two

convoys carrying food aid intended for the people of Kosovo... [Christel

Neudeck, spokeswoman for the German NGO Komitee Cap Anamur, said] police

siezed the convoys at a checkpoint... Each convoy was carrying 100 tons of

flour, oil and sugar. The police found that the two convoys' papers were in

order but [said] they would have to carry out checks on the suppliers of

the foodstuffs."

Reuters reported yesterday that "some aid organizations said they planned

to withdraw staff again [before the Saturday deadline]... Representatives

of all the non-governmental organizations operating in Kosovo were due to

meet Friday to review their evacuation plans."

* Number of displaced growing, unexplained deaths continuing

The Mother Theresa Society (Pristina) reported yesterday that the count of

displaced persons (IDPs) in Kosovo "has increased [from a January 15 count

of 224,948] by almost 52,000 to 276,851 primarily due to continued unrest

and fighting." The Mother Theresa Society reported large increases in the

number of IDPs in the Pristina, Pec, Djakovica, Suva Reka, and Ferizaj

districts. The NGO also noted that the "number of beneficiaries on the

rolls which includes social cases, host families and returning IDPs (a

separate count from the IDP count)... [stands at] 317,938, for a total

combined need of 594,789 people in need of assistance."

Associated Press reported February 13 that "a rare daytime bombing injured

at least nine people Saturday outside a government-owned bank in Kosovo...

As many as 20 shops were damaged in the afternoon blast just outside the

Jugobanka bank in Urosevac... The bomb was 'huge,' with an explosive power

perhaps equivalent to an anti-tank mine, said Jorgen Grunnet, spokesman for

the OSCE in Kosovo." No party has yet claimed responsibility for the

bombings. The International Helsinki Federation reported yesterday that

"while the perpetrators of such bomb attacks and explosions in urban,

public sites throughout Kosovo are unknown, the incidents are assumed to

have been signals by Serbian paramilitaries of opposition to the peace

process, and their determination to extend the program of anti-Albanian

intimidation that has been going on for over ten years."

Independent Radio 21 (Pristina) reported February 17 that two babies had

died due to lack of food and medical treatment in Dashinovac village in

Decan municipality.

The Committee for the Protection of Women and Children (Pristina) reported

February 11 that two Albanians were killed on their way to work in Dubrave

and Peje village, and noted that in Gllogovc village, one Albanian was

reported shot dead by Serbian police while stepping off from his tractor.

KDOM yesterday reported finding the bodies of two ethnic Albanians near the

village of Dubdevik in the Drenica area.

Independent news service ARTA (Pristina) reported February 16 that "a

small civilian Serb organized group have recently kidnapped and killed

several Albanians in the municipality of Peje...this phenomenon becomes

alarming, when people recall the previous actions of the terrorist group

'Black Hand.' "

ARTA reported February 16 that 30 Serbian police stopped and ill-treated

many Albanians in open market in Mitrovica. Radio 21 reported February 15

that unknown persons abducted two Albanians in Ferizaj. ARTA also reported

that "four Serb policemen abducted two young Albanians near the bus station

in Mitrovice." Independent Radio 21 stated February 16 that Serb forces

control Rahovec and three other villages in this Rahovec area.

ARTA reported February 17 that "constant movements [in Djakovica] of the

Serb army have been witnessed in the Albanian owned house yards...soldiers

ordered the residents of the village to turn the lights off during the

night [and] large Serb army forces have been stationed in this border village."

Mercy Corps International reported February 16 the results of a survey of

children's health and nutrition conducted jointly in Kosovo by Mercy Corps,

UNICEF and Action Against Hunger: "There are significant levels of stunting

[growth] which reflect multiple chronic factors like nutrition, genetics,

poor environment and diarrheal disease... other important indicators

regarding diarrhea... access to hygenic water and sanitation and access to

medical care demonstrate the need for intervention in these areas."

III. FIGHTING/FORCE DEPLOYMENTS

The International Helsinki Federation reported that "Serbian forces

[February 18] shelled the villages of the Podujeva region and the KLA

positions in Llapashtica, Lupc, Godishnjak, Majac and others. Reports of

casualties are not yet available as of this writing. There has been Serbian

artillery shelling against KLA positions and Albanian civilian

neighborhoods in Drenica region, near the village of Llapushnik."

Independent ARTA reported February 16 that more clashes were witnessed in

Podujeva region: "There are reports that the Serb police/military forces

used heavy weaponry starting from Praga [mobile anti-aircraft weapons],

mine launchers to cannons." ARTA February 17 reported another offensive by

Serbian police using heavy artillery, large-caliber cannons and other

weapons against the village of Llapashtice. ARTA also reported February 17

that "shooting [in Glogovac] lasted for about 50 minutes and that a

military plane circled above this area throughout the whole time of

confrontation."

The US Kosovo Diplomatic Observer Mission (KDOM) reported February 17 that

"there was some exchange of smallarms fire between Serb police and KLA

[Kosovo Liberation Army] personnel...in Luzane, along the PristinaPodujevo

highway. Also, in Gornja Lapastica, Serbian forces fired mortars on KLA

positions."

KDOM reported February 17 that "the Stimlje, Glogovac, and Kijevo areas of

southern Drenica remain very tense with heavy concentrations of VJ and

police... Serb police checkpoints near Orahovac established after the mass

killing at Rogovo are still operating at night. Checkpoints in Drenica

remain in place, but KDOM patrols note no expansion of their activities.

Villagers still complain of checkpoints in the west hindering freedom of

movement in the area."

Agence France Presse reported February 16 that near Racak, "police occupy

hilltop houses within sniper's range, and the army is understood to have

heavy weapons in the area that could be...trained on the village in a

matter of hours." ARTA reported February 17 that "a military convoy

comprised of two tanks, 3 APCs, 3 trucks, 2 jeeps and two terrain vehicles,

loaded with Serb soldiers and officers was seen leaving the military

barrack in Mitrovice [and stationed] in the village of Kutlovc....

[further] military movements were noticed in Kline region...a truck, a

terrain vehicle and an APC, filled with Serb soldiers, were stationed in

the village of Rigjeve, and broke into most Albanian houses [while]

military movements were also noticed in Sferke region as well."

Independent Radio 21 reported February 15 that "a convoy of Serb forces

backed up with 4 tanks, 4 vehicles carrying anti-air arms, 5 lorries and

other military vehicles went in the direction of Bukoshi village." Radio

21 also reported the movement and deployment of large military Serb force

in the vicinity of Perceve village in Klina municipality. ARTA reported

February 16 a "large military convoy, composed of 20 tanks, tens of

transporters and many other military vehicles and fighting machinery

arrived" in Kosovo from Belgrade.

KDOM reported February 16 observing "a significant increase in police

checkpoints around Pristina, and there were also reports of OSCE vehicles

being stopped by Serbian police... The F.R.Y. continues to rotate troops

into and within Kosovo, resulting in the visible movements of VJ [Yugoslav

Army] forces over the past few days. KVM continues to monitor troop

movements. An army "exercise" near Vucitrn reportedly has raised tensions

among residents of that area. These VJ activities appear to some to be

designed to provoke the KLA."

KDOM reported February 17: "Deep concern continues over the fate of the

two Serbian railroad policemen (Officers Markovic and Djuricic) kidnaped on

February 9 in Vucitrn. Over the past several days, both KDOM and the KVM

have undertaken intensive investigations of the disappearances but have

turned up no new leads. There have been no claims of responsibility for the

abductions and no ransom or prisonerexchange demands. The KLA general staff

insist they are not holding the two men. They told KDOM again yesterday

that their organization, as a policy, does not take hostages. They further

suggest that either the Albanian mafia or Serbian paramilitary units are

responsible for the kidnappings. The general staff has directed its

commanders to search for the men and has promised KDOM full cooperation in

whatever they discover." KDOM noted yesterday that "KDOM and KVM defused

another intermediate crisis in the kidnaping case when they arranged to

inspect the KLA headquarters premises in Lidovica which was believed by

Serb Police General Lukic to be the location in which the missing officers

were being held. KDOM/KVM personnel searched the buildings and found no

evidence of the missing men."

KDOM reported that "on February 12 at around 6:30 p.m., the KVM received

word of the shooting death of a civilian man and wounding of two policemen

near the village of Donji (3 km. south of Glogovac)."

The Committee for the Protection of Women and Children reported February

10 that "Podujevo villages are being shelled by Serb forces and Yugoslav

army [and that] tensions seem to be escalating in the Podujevo-Llapshtice

region, where VJ movements were noticed... In Malisheva municipality, Serb

artillery fire was reported as well."

IV. ARRESTS/DETENTIONS/REPRESSION

Radio 21 reported yesterday that a local LDK [Kosovo Democratic League]

leader was arrested by Serb security officials in his office in Urosevac

yesterday noon.

Independent news service BETA (Belgrade) reported that "a trial started on

Feb. 15, at the District court in Prokuplje against a group of 14

Albanians, who were arrested upon their return from temporary work abroad

at the end of July 1998, it was confirmed to BETA at the Prokuplje court. A

lawyer said that they were accused of uniting for the purpose of enemy

activities and terrorism. The Albanian language dailies reported that a

court procedure would begin, at the District Court in Gnjilane on Feb. 16,

against eight Kosovo Albanians from that municipality, accused of terrorism

and uniting for the purpose of enemy activities. It was reported that they

were arrested in two separate groups, on Aug. 15 and Oct. 15, 1998, and

were accused of participating in the organization of troops of the

separatist Kosovo Liberation Army on the territory of Gnjilane."

Radio 21 reported February 14 the arrest by Serbian forces of "more than

40 Albanians" in Urosevac in the wake of Saturday's bombing there. Local

independent media also reported the arrests of nine ethnic Albanians in

Podujevo, of eight ethnic Albanians in Mitrovica (including four arrested

while in a post office) and three Albanians in Djakovica district since

February 15. Radio 21 reported February 15 that one Albanian in Prizren

had sentenced to two years in prison.

Radio 21 reported February 15 that "seven Albanians were sentenced to

total 22 years in prison" in Pec district court.

KDOM reported February 18 that "according to media and other sources, five

KLA soldiers, reportedly off duty, were arrested by Serbian police in

Podujevo yesterday. Their whereabouts are unknown today."

 
Argomenti correlati:
stampa questo documento invia questa pagina per mail