From: Tseten Samdup < HYPERLINK "mailto:tibetlondon@GN.APC.ORG" tibetlondon@GN.APC.ORG >

To: Multiple recipients of list TSGL < HYPERLINK "mailto:TSGL@VM1.MCGILL.CA" TSGL@VM1.MCGILL.CA >

(February 28, 1997)The annual session of China's National People's Congress (NPC), which opens tomorrow, is expected to enact extensive revisions to the nation's criminal code including the elimination of the statutes on counterrevolution," which have in the past been used to imprison many of the Chinese government's critics. Human Rights Watch/Asia and Human Rights in China, concerned that crimes of "counterrevolution" may simply be replaced in the new code by the crime of "jeopardizing state security" without any fundamental easing of restrictions on expression or association, urge the NPC to define state security offenses in clear, narrowlydrawn terms so as to ensure that the criminal justice system may no longer be used as a tool for the suppression of peaceful religious and political dissent.

The two organizations also urge the NPC to undertake a systematic review of the cases of all those convicted under the counterrevolution articles of the criminal code. Those imprisoned under Articles 98, 99 and 102 should be immediately released, since they are clearly detained only for nonviolent exercise of the fundamental rights and freedoms China recognizes in its Constitution. Those convicted under the remaining counterrevolution articles should be entitled to a reexamination of their cases through a mechanism set up under the NPC. The latter, for example, could establish a Review Commission that could, through hearings open to the public and the media, assess the evidence in each case individually and release all those held for peaceful expression, association and assembly.

While some of the other legal reforms that the NPC is expected to enact may represent genuine advances in criminal justice, the removal of "counterrevolution" statutes does not appear to be one of them. A December 1996 statement by Wang Hanbin, vice chairman of the NPC Standing Committee, that "counterrevolutionary activities stipulated in the current criminal law are still all considered as crimes" in the Committee's proposed revisions seems to indicate that the changes are to be cosmetic, rather than the fundamental revision of the Criminal Code many Chinese legal scholars have been advocating since the early 1980s.

Deng Xiaoping's passing, however, and the beginning of a new political era is an opportunity to make the NPC session a turning point for China's legal system and give substance to China's oftstated commitment to the protection of human rights. Instead of simply changing the name of the offense from "counterrevolution" to "jeopardizing state security," the NPC could model its security legislation on standards articulated in the Johannesburg Principles on National Security, drafted in 1995 by an international group of experts on law and human rights and considered a model of good practice in this area of law. In accordance with the Johannesburg Principles, specifically, the NPC should adhere to the following in enacting its revisions of the Criminal Code:

The law should allow the greatest possible degree of freedom of expression and information, recognizing that people have a right to express their opinions, even if offensive, and to gain information about all facets of the operation of their government, even when these relate to national security concerns.

Legitimate national security interests should be defined narrowly, such as those protecting "the country's existence or its territorial integrity against the use or threat of force, or its capacity to respond to the threat or use of force [...]" (Johannesburg Principles, Art. 2.(a)

Any restrictions on expression or information on grounds of protecting national security must be clear, unambiguous and narrowly drawn; and must be open to challenge through review by an independent court, in which the government is required to show that the said restriction has the genuine purpose and demonstrable effect of protecting national security.

To give full effect to the abolition of the crime of counterrevolution and the incorporation of the above principles into national law, the NPC should also begin a thorough assessment of other laws to bring them into conformity with these principles. In particular, the NPC should act speedily to repeal the 1993 State Security Law and its implementing regulations. The 1988 Law on the Preservation of State Secrets and its implementing regulations should be thoroughly amended to incorporate safeguards for basic rights, protections for disclosure in the public interest and a much tighter classification system, as well as review of classification decisions by an independent court in case of dispute.

These revisions are particularly important given that in the past year, a number of individuals have been convicted of offenses such as "conspiracy to overthrow the government," "leaking state secrets" and "espionage" when the sole evidence presented at their trials was their nonviolent advocacy of points of view that clashed with prevailing policy. For example, the peaceful actions of both Wang Dan and Wei Jingsheng, sentenced respectively to eleven and fourteen years' imprisonment for "conspiring to overthrow the government," were deemed to be threats to national security, while information about individuals convicted on criminal charges for their role in the 1989 protests was labeled a "state secret" in the trial of Li Hai, who was given a nineyear term for collecting such data. No evidence has been made public which shows that Tibetan scholar Ngawang Choepel, recently sentenced to eighteen years in prison for "espionage," was doing anything but collecting material for his study of Tibetan music and danc

e. Protecting state security was mentioned as a rationale for prosecution in all of these cases.

Human Rights Watch/Asia Human Rights Watch is a nongovernmental organization established in 1978 to monitor and promote the observance of internationally recognized human rights in Africa, the Americas, Asia, the Middle East and among the signatories of the Helsinki accords. The staff includes Kenneth Roth, executive director; Cynthia Brown, program director; Susan Osnos, communications director; and Wilder Tayler, general counsel. Robert L. Bernstein is the chair of the board and Adrian W. DeWind is vice chair. Its Asia division was established in 1985 to monitor and promote the observance of internationally recognized human rights in Asia. Sidney Jones is the executive director; Mike Jendrzejczyk is the Washington director; and Robin Munro is the Hong Kong director. Andrew J. Nathan is chair of the advisory committee and Orville Schell is vice chair.

Human Rights in China HRIC is an independent nongovernmental organization founded by Chinese scientists and scholars in March 1989. HRIC monitors the implementation of international human rights standards in the PRC and carries out human rights advocacy among Chinese people inside and outside the country. HRIC's objectives are to facilitate the development of a grassroots human rights movement in China and to promote international scrutiny of China's human rights situation.

Website Address: HYPERLINK http://www.hrw.org http://www.hrw.org Gopher Address:

HYPERLINK gopher://gopher.humanrights.org:5000/11/int/hrw gopher://gopher.humanrights.org:5000/11/int/hrw Listserv instructions:

To subscribe to the general HRW email list (to receive press releases and public letters concerning all regions of the world), send an email message to HYPERLINK mailto:majordomo@igc.apc.org majordomo@igc.apc.org with "subscribe hrwnews" in the body of the message (leave the subject line blank). To subscribe to the Asiaspecific list (to receive press releases and public letters only on Asia), send a message to HYPERLINK mailto:majordomo@igc.apc.org majordomo@igc.apc.org with "subscribe hrwnewsasia" in the body of the message (leave the subject line blank). Human Rights in China 485 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10017 Tel:

(212) 6612909 Fax: (212) 6879786 Email: HYPERLINK mailto:hrichina@igc.apc.org hrichina@igc.apc.org

Human Rights Watch 485 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 100176104 TEL:

212/9728400 FAX: 212/9720905 Email: HYPERLINK mailto:hrwnyc@hrw.org hrwnyc@hrw.org

1522 K Street, N.W. Washington D.C. 20005 TEL: 202/3716592 FAX:

202/3710124 Email: HYPERLINK mailto:hrwdc@hrw.org hrwdc@hrw.org

THE OFFICE OF TIBET, TIBET HOUSE, 1 CULWORTH STREET

LONDON NW8 7AF, UNITED KINGDOM

The Office of Tibet is the official agency of His Holiness the Dalai Lama

Tel: 0044171722 5378 Fax: 0044171722 0362

Email: HYPERLINK mailto:tibetlondon@gn.apc.org tibetlondon@gn.apc.org

Internet: HYPERLINK http://www.gn.apc.org/tibetlondon http://www.gn.apc.org/tibetlondon