Radicali.it - sito ufficiale di Radicali Italiani
Notizie Radicali, il giornale telematico di Radicali Italiani
cerca [dal 1999]


i testi dal 1955 al 1998

  RSS
gio 03 lug. 2025
[ cerca in archivio ] ARCHIVIO STORICO RADICALE
Notizie Tibet
Partito Radicale Alberto - 31 luglio 1997
SECOND PAGE - FREEDOM FOR TIBET/DEMOCRACY IN CHINA-FAX ! - #61
_________________________________________

THE RULE OF LAW: INTERVIEW WITH QIAO SHAN

In the programme put on air on July the 5th, we had on air also Mr Qiao Shan, of Human Rights in China. He underlined a topic, which seems to me to be very interesting: in the former British Colony Chinese power is affirming "it will basically rule by law". But it does not mean the Rule of Law.

Here you have the transcription of a few words out of the programme:

when we talk about an open and democratic society in which human rights can be institutionally respected, we are talking about those elements in the society that are indivisible, or indispensable to protect freedom and human rights, such as the rule of law, the democratic system which can hold the government power accountable to the people.

The rule of law is an element, here, which means there is independent judicial system; the legislation is made by a democratic process. And that is very different than the so called rule by law. Rule by law means that the administration can have absolute power, can manage the society by a set of regulations you can call law, but regardless to the process producing this legislation.

I'll give you an example. What happens in China now, about this National Security law under the criminal Code called "Endangering State Security". These are the new legal concepts established in the Chinese legal system now.

This concept is very broad, and can be interpreted in different ways. For example, under the State Security Law, there is an article saying which activities are endangering state security. The subarticle is including fabricating faxes, and disseminating information which can endanger the state security.

Who defines if that information endangers state security or not? the Ministry of State Security.

Who drafted this law? is the Communist Party's Legal Affairs Committee.

Who passed this law is the People's Congress the members of which are appointed by the Communist Party.

And who is going to implement this law is the State Security Bureau and the Public Security Bureau, both are Government Administrative Agencies.

Being the people run by these laws, by these agencies, how can they oppose? They cannot, in China. Because the judicial system is not independent.They cannot go to an independent court to oppose whatever the government did.

So, we see the example here, it is the rule by law, and it is already being used against Wei Jingshen, Wand Dang, and it has been used against hundreds in the past years in China

(Published by FREEDOM FOR TIBET/DEMOCRACY IN CHINA ! - Number 61 - 31 July, 1997)

 
Argomenti correlati:
stampa questo documento invia questa pagina per mail