World Tibet Network News Thursday, March 05, 1998
Washington, D.C. March 5, 1998 (ICT) - As both houses of Congress Thursday
consider resolutions urging President Clinton to pursue a United Nations
resolution on China's human rights practices, the Robert F. Kennedy Memorial
Center for Human Rights called on the administration to initiate this effort
without further delay. The Senate is scheduled to debate a China resolution
at 12pm Thursday in the form of an amendment to a transportation bill (ISTEA)
and the House International Relations Asia and Pacific Subcommittee meets at
2pm Thursday to mark up a similar resolution. Both resolutions urge U.S.
action on China at this year's session of the U.N. Commission on Human
Rights, which begins March 16 in Geneva.
"The administration's commitment to seek a resolution addressing China's
human rights abuses at the Commission on Human Rights is the last piece of
a U.S. human rights policy toward China that has already lost most of its
teeth," said James Silk, director of the Robert F. Kennedy Memorial Center
for Human Rights. "There can be no principled justification for abandoning
the effort this year when, as the administration acknowledges, China has
failed to make meaningful progress on meeting its human rights obligations."
The U.N. Commission on Human Rights, the world's leading international
human rights forum, meets for six weeks every spring. Each year since
China's brutal suppression of the 1989 Tiananmen Square Democracy Movement,
the U. S. has joined a multilateral effort to gain consideration and
passage of a Commission resolution about the human rights situation in
China. Each year, the proposed resolution makes moderate criticisms of the
Chinese government's human rights practices and modest recommendations for
improving them.
The government of China has conducted an intense international lobbying
campaign every year to prevent the Commission from considering the China
resolution. China has often released a few political prisoners and taken
other small positive steps in the period leading up to the annual Commission
session. Only in 1995, when the United States engaged in an early and
aggressive effort, has China failed to block consideration of its human
rights record. That year, the resolution fell one vote short of passing.
In a letter to President Clinton last month, the RFK Memorial Center for
Human Rights and eight other human rights organizations stated: "Beijing has
demonstrated that it is sensitive to external pressure and criticism of its
human rights record. China would not have made even these minimal
concessions without the prospect of the Commission resolution. The value of
the resolution is its utility as a tool to help bring about further
improvements."
The Clinton Administration has stated repeatedly that only significant,
concrete improvements in the human rights situation in China would justify
reconsideration of the U.S. commitment to seek passage of a Commission
resolution on China.
Testifying before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on September 17,
1997, Assistant Secretary of State for East Asia and Pacific Affairs Stanley
Roth, said: "[I]f we can get significant progress, not minimal, then we can
make a judgment that it wouldn't be necessary to go forward. . . . [I]t
would have to be a significant degree of progress that would, I think, have
considerable public support and congressional support. It could not be pro
forma."
Only a month ago, on February 3, Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy,
Human Rights and Labor John Shattuck, testifying at a hearing before the
House Subcommittee on International Relations and Human Rights, said: "We do
not see major changes. We have not characterized China as having
demonstrated major changes."
Ten days ago, on February 23, the European Union, which has sponsored and
supported the China resolution in the past, announced that it would not do so
this year. The EU cited several recent steps that China has taken as reasons
for dropping the resolution: China's signing of the International Covenant on
Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: its invitation to the U.N. High
Commissioner for Human Rights to visit China; its negotiations with the
International Committee of the Red Cross over possible future visits to
China's prisons; the 1997 visit to China by the U.N. Working Group on
Arbitrary Detention; and the release from prison of prodemocracy activist and
Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights Award laureate Wei Jingsheng.
"We can welcome China's recent gestures without pretending that they are the
significant steps the United States has consistently said it would take to
stop pursuing the U.N. resolution," said Silk. "And it is important to keep
Wei Jingsheng's release from prison in perspective. He was forced to leave
the country. If he tries to return to China, he will be imprisoned again.
He has stressed that thousands of others remain in harsh prison conditions
merely for exercising their fundamental human rights. And he has stated
unequivocally to the U.S. government that his release should not serve as an
excuse to abandon the Geneva effort."
###
Sean Crowley
Communications Director
Robert F. Kennedy Memorial
1367 Connecticut Ave., NW
Suite 200
Washington, DC 20036
Phone:(202) 463-7575, ext. 241
FAX: (202) 463-6606
Email: crowleys@rfkmemorial.org