For an international conference in 1995:

(i) overtly in favour:

ITALY, SPAIN

(ii) supportive ( or would not oppose):

AUSTRIA, THE NETHERLANDS

For an international conference in 1996:

(i) overtly in favour:

AUSTRALIA, CANADA, NEW ZEALAND, CROATIA, ARGENTINA, POLAND

(ii) supportive ( or would not oppose):

FRANCE, GERMANY, BELGIUM, IRELAND, BIELORUSSIA, GUATEMALA, SLOVENIA, MEXICO, BRAZIL, NORWAY, DENMARK, FINLAND, ICELAND, SWEDEN ( EUROPEAN UNION and NORDIC COUNTRIES as regional bodies)

For a postponement of any decision to the next UNGA and for the establishment of an ad hoc intersessional Committee:

UNITED STATES, UNITED KINGDOM, INDIA, HUNGARY ( and possibly CHINA and RUSSIA)