I think this questions should be discussed by less general way. I mean, that that answer on the question to co-promote or not can differ each time. "Cynically" speaking, I mean: if we are not main co-promoter, if we don't have time and force to do all alone (like on February 23, when the formal request and main amount of participants are presented by Soldiers' Mothers), I consider it is useful to join the initiative and became a co-promoter.

In other cases, as with our conscientious objection appeal, frankly speaking I prefer and I try to provide it, that this appeal would be considered by subscribers and by mass media as "an appeal promoted by Radical Party", and not by a number of organizations including Radical Party. The last such an appeal, in 1991 was mistakenly (as I think) promoted by Radical Party and a big amount of other groups (although in fact exactly RP was initiator of it). The result for us could be better.

Concerning Marcia delle Palme, I don't know, but it seems to me, it is exactly the case, when Radical Party does everything itself (if I am not wrong), and other possible co-promoters are only for... exactly, for what, by the way? I don't mean Hands Off Cain, 'cause it is more or less also Radical Party. Or not?