The is a billboard on the wall in the corridor of our Moscow office. On this billboard we hang among other things also this famous membership table. Each time when a person enters the office, he/she immediately begin to laugh, reading that republics which for every ex-Soviet inhabitant are a symbol of Asia, are "moved" to Eastern Europe. "Oh, those Italians...", can only say a guest when he/she finishes to roar, dries the tears and begins to be able to speak. Vice versa, our friends from those Asian republics - like Marat Zakhidov or Aitbaj Konysbaev - became sorrowful each time looking that billboard. "Of course, - they told sighing, - who cazzo in Europe can know in what posterior hole are our countries..."

Frankly, I couldn't imagine that it is not a small mistake which there is simply no time to remove, but a decision taken especially and conscientiously - that's why I didn't write anything about it previously. But since now we knew from Giuseppe the truth about "kidnapping Asia", I can authenticate as an inhabitant of ex-USSR - formally and upon oath - that "republics of Central Asia" are truly located in Asia. And I would like solemnly appeal to the Secretary of the Transnational Radical Party in the name of Lord, in the name Justice, in the name of those millions of innocent people living there: please take the decision and allow to return this republics on their proper and authentic geographical position!

Unfortunately, the mysterious geographical behavior of post-Soviet Central Asia is not the only matter of discussion in our corridor. There are also more serious questions. For instance: what does mean the appearance of the fourth Caucasian republic, named "Nagorno-Karabah"? Does it mean that Radical Party decided to recognize independence of Nagorno Karabakh - as first in the world, even before Armenia which did not make it yet? And what cazzo are we waiting for in case of Srpska Krajna (Knin) and Respublika Srpska (Pale), if not of neighboring Abkhazia and Chechnya? The decision about Nagorno Karabakh in terms of Tesseramento specifications is the more strange, since in our data base file we obviously do mark people from Stepanakert as "AZ" (what means "Azerbaijan") in PAESE field, and therefore our membership table represents a funny situation: according to it, in 1994 we had 0 members in Nagorno Karabakh, while everybody knows (at least in that region and in our offices here) that among 149 iscritti in

Azerbaijan 19 were Armenians from Nagorno Karabakh and all 19 were members of their separatist "parliament", including its president!

And last but not least notice. I can imagine that something doesn't work properly between Moscow office, our "central tesseramento for ex-USSR" in Kiev and Tesseramento in Rome, if instead of 159 members in Russia we still for weeks observe in the table the same 146...

Thus, I do not believe in our membership table like in multiplication table.