The last intervention of Michele Boselli opens a very interesting question. Nevertheless, the approach presented by Michele, is not correct from scientific point of view. Russians used to say in such cases: "One looking a straw in an alien eye, does not mark a log in his own".
Actually, the simple analysis of texts contained in Conference Segreteria PR since the beginning of its work, shows an interesting picture (there where counted only texts, contained "cazzo" or some derivative words like "cazzate", "incazzarsi" etc.; also could be that within one text there are existing many "cazzo" and/or "cazzate").
CONFERENCE SEGRETERIA PR
User Amount of cazzo
-----------------------------
S.Rovasio 7
A.Bandinelli 6
M.Boselli 3
M.Lensi 3
M.Turco 3
N.Khramov 3
S.Ottoni 3
A.Filograno 2
A.Spolaor 2
E.Bonino 2
L.Cimino 2
R.Bernardini 2
M.Busdachin 1
P.Pietrosanti 1
R.Spagnoli 1
S.D'Elia 1
============================
TOTAL CAZZO 42
As we see, M.Boselli having 3 cazzo shares the honorary 3rd place with me, M.Lensi, M.Turco and S.Ottoni.
A little bit other situation one can observe in Conference Radical Party. First of all, thanks to the open character of this conference, there are more cazzo in general: 56 instead of only 42 in Segreteria PR. And more free feels here Michele Boselli (probably, because of bigger amount of spectators): having the same 3 cazzo, he lifts (himself) from the 3rd up to the 2nd place, sharing it with A.Bandinelli, G.Gatti and M.Benedetti, while poor N.Khramov vice versa has only 1 cazzo :-(
CONFERENCE RADICAL PARTY
User Amount of cazzo
-----------------------------
D.Pezzilli 7
A.Bandinelli 3
G.Gatti 3
M.Benedetti 3
M.Boselli 3
C.Digiorgio 2
E.Ferrari 2
G.Dentamaro 2
G.Gentile 2
M.Busdachin 2
P.Gull 2
R.Cicciomessere 2
R.Spagnoli 2
V.Donvito 2
A.Barbasso 1
A.Berretti 1
Casella.Pr 1
D.Vacirca 1
F.Sforza 1
G.Campana 1
G.Lorenzi 1
G.Pagano 1
J.Fischetti 1
L.Terni 1
M.Alberico 1
M.Saggese 1
N.Khramov 1
N.Zotti 1
O.Dupuis 1
P.Caridi 1
P.Pietrosanti 1
P.Pizzi 1
S.Ottoni 1
============================
TOTAL CAZZO 56
Frankly speaking I don't have anything against CAZZO, since I consider it 1) a legitime part of human body and 2) a literary word. Even I do not make difference, if it belongs to Michele Boselli. Moreover, I suppose that such a cazzofobia witnesses about one's not fully healthy interest to the subject. However, since Michele Boselli considers that using it by telematic way is not acceptable, I would kindly recommend Michele to hold his own cazzo under more effective control.
