ABSTRACT: Following is the second part of a slanderous article on the Radical Party. According to the Rumanian journalist, the PRT (Transnational Radical Party, ed.) deserves a special place in the long list of dangerous organizations and activities that are currently operating in Rumania. The journalist writes that the declared aims of the Transnational Radical Party are the destruction of the present Rumanian state in order to facilitate the achievement of a number of anti-Rumanian objectives, first and foremost those of the Hungarian irredentism. This "article" sounds much more like a "note" of the notorious secret services than like a normal press article. The radical Party has charged its lawyer in Bucharest to press charges against the editor of the newspaper and the author of the article.

(Spionaj si Contraspionaj, Bucharest, August 1992)

Today more than ever Rumania is the object of vast destabilizing actions from abroad, which have the aim of gradually and totally undermining the sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of the country. By making a cunning and ruthless use of the conditions offered by the scarce capacity of defence, caused by the global and indiscriminate suppression of the defense structures in place in Rumania before the revolution and by the neutralization of the new ones through fear and limitation, and of the new or old foreign anti-Rumanian forces, they have organized open or covert actions to achieve such anti-Rumanian objectives. The means and methods adopted are varying. They include political and diplomatic moves, espionage actions proper, and the clandestine or open activities carried out by secret societies and orders (order of the Knights of Malta, etc), anti-Orthodox religious forces, which range from Catholic movements to the weirdest sects to pseudo-spiritual groups, some of which are forbidden eve

n in India, where they originate.

In the vast list of dangerous organizations and activities that are currently operating in Rumania thanks to the complicity, indifference or powerlessness of those whose task is to defend the country and prevent such actions, a place of honour should be given to the PRT (Transnational Radical Party, ed.), whose declared aims are the destruction of the present Rumanian state in order to facilitate the achievement of a number of anti-Rumanian objectives, first and foremost those of the Hungarian irredentist movement. To give an idea of the scope of the Transnational Radical Party's anti-Rumanian activity we need only say that its actions are supported, directly or indirectly, by a few dozen Rumanian MPs recruited by this party, who currently represent the strongest group sitting in the Chamber of Deputies. The gravity of the situation is unprecedented, considering the massive penetration in the Rumanian parliament of the PRT, therefore of a party that proves to be a combination of an espionage network, a neo-M

asonic organization and a transnational and anti-national subversive organization.

As a political organization, the PRT considers itself the continuation of the Italian Radical Party. The latter was established in 1954, ceased to exist a few years later and was refounded in 1967. Now the Radical Party has relinquished its Italian origin, "rejecting the national dimension as the theoretical and political space of the campaigns for freedom and democracy" and declares to be open to citizens from every country. As a consequences, the Radical Party hinges on the principles of anti-nationalism and anti-authoritarianism in order to attract the radical minorities of the world. By so doing the Radical Party hopes to transform internationalist political programs into a transnational program, replacing the concept of the achievement of a global union through the popular masses with that of a global state (which is the traditional and permanent objective of the freemasonry), which should be gradually achieved by the political elites by means of subsequent forms of federation and which would include st

ates, zones and continents. Obviously during the first stage the process of federation would be achieved on the ashes of the states that created themselves after the second world war, deleting the borders and tracing new ones according to criteria that neglect the national interests and rights of the relative countries in favour of international-transnational objectives of clear Masonic origin. These objectives have been openly outlined during the radical congress held in February 1987, when it was decided that the Radical Party would become an "International and internationalist Party". Only a year later, in January 1988, in Bologna, the Radical Party was conceived as a party "outside of the borders, the parties and the national castes, beyond the borders, the parties, the national states, and open to citizens of various countries". The party's primary objective was the creation of a United States of Europe, on the model of the United States.

Since the early eighties, the PRT has made considerable efforts to extend its activities to eastern Europe, where it enjoyed the total support of the rulers of Budapest. One first objective was the disbanding of Yugoslavia, a federal state that was not subordinated to the international freemasonry and the Vatican, in order to create organizations and forces to support the new concept of European order that could facilitate the achievement of the objectives of the Hungarian nationalism.

Since the years 1984-1985 the PRT has carried out actions with the aim of bringing about destabilization in Yugoslavia, instigating actions of dissent, distributing flyers and secretly organizing demonstrations in favour of ethnic autonomy, of the European integration and the relinquishment of the status of neutrality. The protective measures adopted by the Yugoslav authorities included, among others, the arrest and expulsion of the radical activist Olivier Dupuis, the head of the Transnational Radical Party's Budapest-based branch for central and eastern Europe. Dupuis is a notorious CIA agent working for the Hungarian intelligence, and is in charge of coordinating the Transnational Radical Party's activity in Rumania. Similar "non-violent", "Gandhian" actions were followed by others, secretly organized by the PRT in Croatia - and then in the other Yugoslav republics - and the direct support, mainly through Hungary, of the military actions of the Croatian separatists and of other ethnic groups, which, along

with similar actions taken abroad against the unity of the Yugoslav state, would have led to the disbanding of Yugoslavia and to the goal of triggering a civil war in this country. To give an idea of the policy and the objectives of the Radical Party we need only consider the fact that the "transnationals" asses the situation reached in Yugoslavia as one of their greatest achievements.

The start of the PRT's activity in Rumania is related to the evolution of the events of Timisoara in late 1989, and particularly in spurring attempt towards independence made by some local political circles controlled by Budapest. Immediately after the cessation of the street fighting, when the political games started, the PRT in cooperation with the authorities of Budapest sent emissaries to Timisoara and other cities of Transylvania to recruit acolytes and create branches of the PRT in the area, generate further political groups and assume and support the federalist objectives of the "transnationals", favouring the aims of the Hungarian separatists. These actions were organized by the PRT's Budapest-based Coordination Centre for central and eastern Europe, whose task is promoting the transnational policy in Rumania in general and specifically in Transylvania. The person in charge of this Centre, the Belgian citizen Olivier Dupuis, together with Emil Iovanescu, a Rumanian refugee living in Hungary at the se

rvice of the Hungarian espionage, carried out several visits to the cities of Timisoara, Cluj Napoca, Tirgu Mures, the districts of Covasna, Harghita and other areas of Transylvania with the aim of recruiting supporters of the transnational federalist and anti-Rumanian objectives, and to enact destabilizing actions to facilitate the achievement of such aims. As a consequence:

1. "Information centres" have been set up at the following addresses: Sorina Alexandru, Bucuresti, Str. N. Grigorescu nr. 27. Bloc Y9C, Ap. 27 telephone 43 40 80, Alexandru Popescu, Brasov, Str. Crisan nr.15, Ap.1., telephone 951-14501; Petru Olteanu, Cluj, Str. Masinistilor nr. 52, telephone 95/139728; Janos Raduly, Sf. Gheorghe, Str. Revolutiei nr.10/A Ap.6., Attila Talit, Sf.Gheorghe, Str. Dealului nr.15. Bloc.27. Ap.46; Adrian Borza, Timisoara, Str. Zborului nr.16. Bloc 31, Ap.37; Rodica Liuba, Timisoara, Str. Abrud nr.23 B, Ap.8; Valentin Macsen, Ploiesti, Str. Cerculus nr. 60, telephone 971-46728.

Through its emissaries sent from Budapest and the aforementioned "information centres" the PRT has divulged in Rumania publications printed in Hungary...and has circulated the federalist ideas that instigate to the destruction of Rumania as a Unitarian state and to the creation of a multinational federal state, "the Federal Republic of Rumania" in the context of which the PRT has devised "a level of delegation of power...from the central state...towards non-territorial, territorial, territorial bodies, towards ethnic, cultural and linguistic organizations". In terms of territory, the Federal Republic should include "four or five regions with a prevalent Rumanian majority, two regions with a mixed population but with a Rumanian majority, one smaller region with a Hungarian majority and, lastly, a federal district surrounding Bucharest.

2. Immediately after the revolution, the PRT's emissaries managed to recruit Rumanian citizens who, by political belief and because of the instructions received by Budapest or for material interests, have joined this party--a Masonic-irredentist lodge; in 1989 there was one member of the PRT, in 1990 they were 67, in 1991 111, and this year their number is placed at a much higher figure. With few exceptions, the members of the PRT in Rumania are Members of Parliament, members of the Chamber of Deputies. The majority are deputies of the FSN, ardent supporters of Petre Roman, with whom - should voices circulating on the Rumanian and foreign press be confirmed - they have common grounds in the principles of freemasonry. These are followed, numerically speaking, by the MPs of the UDMR, headed by Erno Borbely, Laszlo Zsigmond, Iului Brendus and Ferenc Pecsi, devote collaborators of Olivier Dupuis and convinced supporters of the federation process. The list of transnational parliamentarians sitting in the Chamber

of Deputies continues with MPs belonging to the PER (Environmentalist Party, ed.), the MER (Environmentalist party, ed.), the PNL (National Liberal Party, ed.), the PDAR (Agrarian Democratic Party, ed.), the PUNR (Party of the National Unity, ed.) and with those of the Union of Ukrainians and of the Democratic Party of the Rom People and with independents (perhaps independent from the national concept) such as the MP Daniela Crasnaru.

3. To complete a realistic picture of the PRT and to stress possible implications for the national security which stem from the affiliation of some Rumanian MPs to this "party", and especially from the link with some Budapest-based emissaries of the transnational subversion, we need to point out, along with the ones that are the competence of the SRI (Rumanian Intelligence Service, ed.), some significant aspects:

- Olivier Dupuis, head of the Coordination Centre for central and eastern Europe based in Budapest and pointed out by the press as a notorious spy at the service of Budapest, with good connections with the heads of the UDMR. His transnational activity in the hot areas of eastern Europe dates back to 1985, when he was arrested in Yugoslavia for instigation and participation in anti-state actions and who then participated personally in the events in Croatia.

Since 1990 he has been active in the same direction with the Timisoara Society, under the cover of the generous idea of human rights, visiting and organizing events on the river Bega (local rover, ed.) in coincidence with a number of local political actions that pursue the independence of the Banat (North-Western region of Rumania bordering with Vojvodina and Hungary, ed.). Olivier Dupuis is assisted by a group pf "revolutionaries" who have declared to go on a hunger strike to support the legionary Doru Braia, and has had several meetings with the representatives of the organizations of the Hungarian youth and of the UDMR in Timisoara, Lugoj, Sfintu Gheorghe, instigating separatist actions and underlining that "the Hungarian population is the only one that can understand the generous ideas of the PRT".

In November 1990, Olivier Dupuis and Emil Iovanescu tried to talk some officials of the Timisoara Television into accepting funds from the Budapest Transnational Centre with a view to creating a private television network with two channels. One of these channels, financed by Budapest through O. Dupuis and the PRT with the sum of $16 million, was to divulge material of transnational propaganda for Rumania and Yugoslavia.

- The close collaborator of Olivier Dupuis and refugee Emil Iovanescu has been an active agent of the Hungarian intelligence service. After being used intensively in the last years to recruit Rumanians willing to betray in favour of Hungary, he has been involved in open actions of the Hungarian irredentist movement, creating and directing the "Pro Transylvania" organization, whose aim is to annex Transylvania to Hungary. Moreover, he has formed an intelligence couple with O. Dupuis and from within the UDMR, of the members and sympathizers of the PRT has gathered information concerning questions of interest for the security of the State, such as the data and information on the ex-Rumanian Securitate, on the activities and on the officials of the SRI, especially in relation to the problems of the Hungarian independence movement, information on the members of Parliament and of the Rumanian government and on their activities, economic and military information.

At the same time, Emil Iovanescu, together with the Rumanian-born French citizen Dumitri Lupascu and other transnationals of Banat and many members of the "Timisoara Society", operates for the reinstatement of the monarchy in Rumania, pro-monarchism being one of the PRT's political options. To that end it relies on the organization of destabilizing, anarchic-extremist actions carried out on the basis of scripts (sic) coming from abroad, from Budapest, and developed with the participation of right-wing circles and elements, with a special role carried out by the legionaries.

A survey of these undercover peculiarities of the PRT's activity highlights some elements that stress the relation between them and a number of actions carried out by Rumanian MPs who oppose the creation and efficient functioning of the SRI. There are obviously links between the passionate attacks of the FSN MP, the transnational Ion Adrian Vilau, against the SRI, and his affiliation to the PRT.

4. The scope of the PRT's actions in Rumania is also proven by the presence of members of this party-lodge in the media and in some non-parliamentary political circles. The journalists Sorin Rosca Stanescu, Alin Alexandru, Peter Mag, Sever Avram, etc., Smaranda Enache, member of the National Council of the Civic Alliance, co-president of the "Pro-Europe League", editor of the "Mures" review, a declared supporter of the Hungarian cause, David Grigorescu, president of the association "Romania greets Europe", Vladut Nisipeanu, president of Rumania's Democratic Front, and many others, present on the PRT's lists.

5. It is increasingly evident that the PRT's interest for Rumania increases as the political and operative situation of the bordering areas becomes increasingly radical...and transnational. When the events of Yugoslavia clearly outlined the prospect of disbanding this federate state, the intention of the authors of the scenarios and of the foreign agents, including those of the PRT and of Hungary, of tracing new borders, the concerns of Budapest and of the PRT of dismembering Rumania by creating autonomous enclaves according to ethnic criteria has become more intense. The efforts in this direction have been stepped up and have taken the shape of the adoption of a program of the UDMR with the purpose of obtaining complete autonomy in every zone or area of Rumania where the Hungarians account for more than 50% of the population. Relying on support from abroad and on the indecision of some Rumanian factors, the PRT and Budapest aim to insist on this objective while the conditions are favourable.

At the same time, with the same way of conceiving things, the PRT is concerned with the fate of the eastern part of Rumania, with the future of Bessarabia and Bucovina. In conformity with the findings established by the transnational directors, Transnistria would become an independent state, whereas Bessarabia and Bucovina, if they so wish, would join Rumania as independent areas in the context of a federation willing to relinquish its borders and to other characteristics of an independent state to be part of the United States of Europe.

These diversionist ideas were recently outlined at the 36th Congress of the PRT held in Rome in the context of a wider array of themes which include the current objectives of this transnational objectives: federalism, drugs and anti-prohibitionism, abolition of the death penalty, introduction of an international language (Esperanto), the rights of the national minorities, conscientious objection (refusal to serve the army), actions of protect through non-violence.

To the satisfaction of the PRT and of Budapest, more than 40 MPs, members of the above mentioned political groups and ethnic groups, participated in this congress. As a consequence of this the "Rumanian delegation" (whoever authorized them to call themselves this way?) ranked second in terms of number of participants, after Croatia (54) and before Bulgaria (29) and Russia (23).

During the debate, the "Rumanian issues" were addressed twice, each time thinking of a possible federation of the country. The first time the MPs of the UDMR violently attacked Rumania, maintaining that "the Hungarian minority of Rumania is deprived of its constitutional rights", Erno Borbely, Ferenc Pecsi, Iuliu Brendus and Zsigmond Laszlo launched the usual anti-Rumanian attacks of the UDMR and of Budapest, aiming to convince the world of the autonomy of the Hungarians of Rumania. These patent lies were firmly denied by Anton Lintzmayer, the representative of the Polish minority in Rumania at the Chamber of Deputies, who was also participating in the congress, who said that "Rumania is one of the few countries where the problems of the minorities have been solved radically". Another irksome issue was when the Russian transnationals presented videocassettes and declarations on the alleged violations of human rights in Transnistria and in the Republic of Moldavia, advocating the creation of a republic "of Ni

estr" to protect the Russians of the area and the revision of the borders with the former U.S.S.R. In the context of such falsehood it was said during the congress that there was the need to recognize the autonomy of Transnistria and of calling the Rumanians of Bessarabia to order. As a whole the congress of the transnationals of Rome represented a moment to launch supra-national actions supported logistically by a few centres of power concerned with reorganizing the areas of influence and the borders despite the well-known geopolitical conditions and despite the interests and rights of the national states. This motivated strong attacks against the Maastricht Treaty, which supposedly "jeopardizes the prospect of creating the United States of Europe, representing a factor of instability for the entire Europe" and "fostering the states' tendency to maintain their interests, powers, forces, alliances and peculiarities" notwithstanding the "Community and the common vision of Europe".

Lastly, our distinguished transnational MPs suggested that the seat of the next congress take place in Rumania, on the coast. Fortunately Laszlo Borberly opposed this hypothesis, saying that "in Rumania the participants could not be assured of conditions life and security".

6. The actions take and the objectives pursued by the PRT in Rumania place this party-lodge into a coalition of European forces that "work" at the destruction of the sovereignty, the independence and the national unity of Rumania to the benefit of a new world order and of the foreign circles and interests which have brought about the destabilization and the armed fratricidal conflicts of the last years which persists still. These national and local disasters have been brought about by the PRT, the Catholic Church, the Western intelligence agencies, the Russian and Hungarian ones, the international freemasonry, without differences of rite of obedience, with Hungary in the forefront in launching actions that aim at central and eastern Europe, first and foremost Yugoslavia and Rumania.

Considering the subversive nature of the PRT's activities and the evident danger for the national security for all that has been undertaken against Rumania, the actions of Rumanian and non-Rumanian MPs, it is necessary for Parliament, the Prosecutor and the SRI to act together to stifle any anti-national and anti-constitutional attack.